{"title":"是否有可能以蒙古语、满语和土耳其语的否定形式为基础来证明阿尔泰学说","authors":"Joanna Dolińska","doi":"10.1075/alal.21023.dol","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe research question posed in this article is whether the Altaic theory is possible, if it is discussed on the basis of chosen negative forms in Mongolian, Turkish, Manchu and its Sibe dialect. The supporters of the Altaic theory assume that these languages (and some include Japanese, Korean and Ainu to this list (Miller, 1967)) emerged from the same root. The opponents of this theory think that the similarities in these languages have resulted from historical contacts between their speakers (Doerfer, 1966, p. 122). This article consists of the analysis of negative forms in various stages of Mongolian, Manchu and Turkish languages carried out on the basis of literary monuments and contemporary resources. The conclusions concerning the possibility of the Altaic theory based on the described negative forms have been presented at the end, accompanied by the Index of negative particles and suffixes.","PeriodicalId":322360,"journal":{"name":"Asian Languages and Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it possible to prove the Altaic theory on the basis of negative forms in Mongolian, Manchu and Turkish\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Dolińska\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/alal.21023.dol\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe research question posed in this article is whether the Altaic theory is possible, if it is discussed on the basis of chosen negative forms in Mongolian, Turkish, Manchu and its Sibe dialect. The supporters of the Altaic theory assume that these languages (and some include Japanese, Korean and Ainu to this list (Miller, 1967)) emerged from the same root. The opponents of this theory think that the similarities in these languages have resulted from historical contacts between their speakers (Doerfer, 1966, p. 122). This article consists of the analysis of negative forms in various stages of Mongolian, Manchu and Turkish languages carried out on the basis of literary monuments and contemporary resources. The conclusions concerning the possibility of the Altaic theory based on the described negative forms have been presented at the end, accompanied by the Index of negative particles and suffixes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Languages and Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Languages and Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.21023.dol\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Languages and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.21023.dol","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文提出的研究问题是,如果以蒙古语、土耳其语、满语及其西伯利亚方言中所选择的否定形式为基础来讨论阿尔泰学说是否可能。阿尔泰语系理论的支持者认为这些语言(包括日语、韩语和阿伊努语)来自同一个词根(Miller, 1967)。这一理论的反对者认为,这些语言的相似性是由于它们的使用者之间的历史接触造成的(Doerfer, 1966, p. 122)。本文在文献文献和当代资源的基础上,对蒙古语、满语和突厥语各阶段的否定形式进行了分析。关于阿尔泰理论的可能性的结论,基于所描述的否定形式已经提出了在最后,伴随着否定粒子和后缀的索引。
Is it possible to prove the Altaic theory on the basis of negative forms in Mongolian, Manchu and Turkish
The research question posed in this article is whether the Altaic theory is possible, if it is discussed on the basis of chosen negative forms in Mongolian, Turkish, Manchu and its Sibe dialect. The supporters of the Altaic theory assume that these languages (and some include Japanese, Korean and Ainu to this list (Miller, 1967)) emerged from the same root. The opponents of this theory think that the similarities in these languages have resulted from historical contacts between their speakers (Doerfer, 1966, p. 122). This article consists of the analysis of negative forms in various stages of Mongolian, Manchu and Turkish languages carried out on the basis of literary monuments and contemporary resources. The conclusions concerning the possibility of the Altaic theory based on the described negative forms have been presented at the end, accompanied by the Index of negative particles and suffixes.