减少测试用例的缓存优化

Dániel Vince, Ákos Kiss
{"title":"减少测试用例的缓存优化","authors":"Dániel Vince, Ákos Kiss","doi":"10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding the relevant part of failure-inducing inputs is an important first step on the path of debugging. If much of a test case that triggers a bug does not contribute to the actual failure, then the time required to fix the bug can increase considerably. In this paper, we focus on the memory requirements of automatic test case reduction. During minimization, the same test case might be tested multiple times, and determining the outcome of an input may take time, therefore, different caching solutions were proposed to avoid re-testing previously seen inputs. We investigated the caching solutions of DDMIN and HDD, and found that their scaling is suboptimal. We propose three optimizations for one of the state-of-the-art caching solutions: with the optimizations combined, DDMIN requires 96% and HDD requires 85% less memory compared to the baseline implementation. Furthermore, as a side effect, the reduction becomes faster by 9.9% with DDMIN.","PeriodicalId":143812,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cache Optimizations for Test Case Reduction\",\"authors\":\"Dániel Vince, Ákos Kiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finding the relevant part of failure-inducing inputs is an important first step on the path of debugging. If much of a test case that triggers a bug does not contribute to the actual failure, then the time required to fix the bug can increase considerably. In this paper, we focus on the memory requirements of automatic test case reduction. During minimization, the same test case might be tested multiple times, and determining the outcome of an input may take time, therefore, different caching solutions were proposed to avoid re-testing previously seen inputs. We investigated the caching solutions of DDMIN and HDD, and found that their scaling is suboptimal. We propose three optimizations for one of the state-of-the-art caching solutions: with the optimizations combined, DDMIN requires 96% and HDD requires 85% less memory compared to the baseline implementation. Furthermore, as a side effect, the reduction becomes faster by 9.9% with DDMIN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

找出诱发故障的输入的相关部分是调试过程中重要的第一步。如果触发错误的大部分测试用例不会导致实际的失败,那么修复错误所需的时间就会大大增加。在本文中,我们主要关注自动测试用例缩减的内存需求。在最小化期间,相同的测试用例可能被测试多次,并且确定输入的结果可能需要时间,因此,提出了不同的缓存解决方案,以避免重新测试以前看到的输入。我们研究了DDMIN和HDD的缓存解决方案,发现它们的可伸缩性不是最优的。我们为最先进的缓存解决方案之一提出了三个优化:与基线实现相比,DDMIN需要96%的内存,HDD需要85%的内存。此外,作为副作用,DDMIN的降低速度更快,达到9.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cache Optimizations for Test Case Reduction
Finding the relevant part of failure-inducing inputs is an important first step on the path of debugging. If much of a test case that triggers a bug does not contribute to the actual failure, then the time required to fix the bug can increase considerably. In this paper, we focus on the memory requirements of automatic test case reduction. During minimization, the same test case might be tested multiple times, and determining the outcome of an input may take time, therefore, different caching solutions were proposed to avoid re-testing previously seen inputs. We investigated the caching solutions of DDMIN and HDD, and found that their scaling is suboptimal. We propose three optimizations for one of the state-of-the-art caching solutions: with the optimizations combined, DDMIN requires 96% and HDD requires 85% less memory compared to the baseline implementation. Furthermore, as a side effect, the reduction becomes faster by 9.9% with DDMIN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信