巴西的健康权:加强最低内容的规范性参数

L. A. Almeida
{"title":"巴西的健康权:加强最低内容的规范性参数","authors":"L. A. Almeida","doi":"10.18593/ejjl.19621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judicialization of the right to health is a growing phenomenon in Brazil. The hard cases deal with medicaments and treatments not included in public policies of Brazilian’s health system, subject that was adressed by Brazilian Supreme Court in “Recurso Extraordinário” n. 566.471/RN. The judicial answer will be constructed by balancing, which demands an analytical structure offered by proportionality and its tests. However, for further legal rationality achieved by further objectification of the balancing, it is important to include the minimum core – standard that defines the intensity of deference and State’s argumentative onus. In this line, using the technical-legal method, the article offers the normative patterns that helps in the definition of the minimum core of right to health in Brazil. Before this, notwithstanding, it will be necessary to examine the comprehension of the minimum core professed by United Nations’ Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.","PeriodicalId":206661,"journal":{"name":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direito à saúde no Brasil: parâmetros normativos para densificação de um conteúdo mínimo\",\"authors\":\"L. A. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.18593/ejjl.19621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The judicialization of the right to health is a growing phenomenon in Brazil. The hard cases deal with medicaments and treatments not included in public policies of Brazilian’s health system, subject that was adressed by Brazilian Supreme Court in “Recurso Extraordinário” n. 566.471/RN. The judicial answer will be constructed by balancing, which demands an analytical structure offered by proportionality and its tests. However, for further legal rationality achieved by further objectification of the balancing, it is important to include the minimum core – standard that defines the intensity of deference and State’s argumentative onus. In this line, using the technical-legal method, the article offers the normative patterns that helps in the definition of the minimum core of right to health in Brazil. Before this, notwithstanding, it will be necessary to examine the comprehension of the minimum core professed by United Nations’ Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.19621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.19621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在巴西,健康权的司法化日益成为一种现象。疑难案件涉及巴西卫生系统公共政策中未包括的药物和治疗,巴西最高法院在" Recurso Extraordinário "第566.471/RN号文件中处理了这一问题。司法答案将通过平衡来构建,这需要一种由相称性及其检验提供的分析结构。然而,为了通过进一步客观化平衡来实现进一步的法律合理性,重要的是要包括定义服从强度和国家辩论责任的最低核心标准。在这方面,本文采用技术-法律方法,提供了有助于界定巴西健康权最低核心的规范模式。然而,在此之前,有必要审查一下对联合国经济、社会和文化权利委员会所承认的最低核心的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direito à saúde no Brasil: parâmetros normativos para densificação de um conteúdo mínimo
The judicialization of the right to health is a growing phenomenon in Brazil. The hard cases deal with medicaments and treatments not included in public policies of Brazilian’s health system, subject that was adressed by Brazilian Supreme Court in “Recurso Extraordinário” n. 566.471/RN. The judicial answer will be constructed by balancing, which demands an analytical structure offered by proportionality and its tests. However, for further legal rationality achieved by further objectification of the balancing, it is important to include the minimum core – standard that defines the intensity of deference and State’s argumentative onus. In this line, using the technical-legal method, the article offers the normative patterns that helps in the definition of the minimum core of right to health in Brazil. Before this, notwithstanding, it will be necessary to examine the comprehension of the minimum core professed by United Nations’ Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信