12导联心电图自动解释的深度学习解决方案

Á. Huerta, A. Martínez-Rodrigo, J. J. Rieta, R. Alcaraz
{"title":"12导联心电图自动解释的深度学习解决方案","authors":"Á. Huerta, A. Martínez-Rodrigo, J. J. Rieta, R. Alcaraz","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A broad variety of algorithms for detection and classification of rhythm and morphology abnormalities in ECG recordings have been proposed in the last years. Although some of them have reported very promising results, they have been mostly validated on short and non-public datasets, thus making their comparison extremely difficult. PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2020 provides an interesting opportunity to compare these and other algorithms on a wide set of ECG recordings. The present model was created by “ELBIT” team. The algorithm is based on deep learning, and the segmentation of all beats in the 12-lead ECG recording, generating a new signal for each one by concatenating sequentially the information found in each lead. The resulting signal is then transformed into a 2-D image through a continuous Wavelet transform and inputted to a convolutional neural network. According to the competition guidelines, classification results were evaluated in terms of a class-weighted F-score (Fβand a generalization of the Jaccard measure (Gβ). In average for all training signals, these metrics were 0.933 and 0.811, respectively. Regarding validation on the testing set from the first phase of the challenge, mean values for both performance indices were 0.654 and 0.372, respectively.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Deep Learning Solution for Automatized Interpretation of 12-Lead ECGs\",\"authors\":\"Á. Huerta, A. Martínez-Rodrigo, J. J. Rieta, R. Alcaraz\",\"doi\":\"10.22489/CinC.2020.305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A broad variety of algorithms for detection and classification of rhythm and morphology abnormalities in ECG recordings have been proposed in the last years. Although some of them have reported very promising results, they have been mostly validated on short and non-public datasets, thus making their comparison extremely difficult. PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2020 provides an interesting opportunity to compare these and other algorithms on a wide set of ECG recordings. The present model was created by “ELBIT” team. The algorithm is based on deep learning, and the segmentation of all beats in the 12-lead ECG recording, generating a new signal for each one by concatenating sequentially the information found in each lead. The resulting signal is then transformed into a 2-D image through a continuous Wavelet transform and inputted to a convolutional neural network. According to the competition guidelines, classification results were evaluated in terms of a class-weighted F-score (Fβand a generalization of the Jaccard measure (Gβ). In average for all training signals, these metrics were 0.933 and 0.811, respectively. Regarding validation on the testing set from the first phase of the challenge, mean values for both performance indices were 0.654 and 0.372, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的几年里,已经提出了各种各样的算法来检测和分类ECG记录中的节律和形态异常。虽然其中一些报告了非常有希望的结果,但它们大多是在短时间和非公开数据集上验证的,因此使它们的比较非常困难。PhysioNet/CinC挑战赛2020提供了一个有趣的机会,可以在广泛的ECG记录上比较这些算法和其他算法。本模型是由“ELBIT”团队创建的。该算法基于深度学习,并对12导联心电图记录中的所有节拍进行分割,通过顺序连接每个导联中的信息,为每个导联产生新的信号。然后将得到的信号通过连续小波变换变换成二维图像,并输入到卷积神经网络中。根据比赛指南,分类结果以类别加权f分(f β)和Jaccard测度(Gβ)的概化来评估。对于所有训练信号,这些指标的平均值分别为0.933和0.811。对于挑战第一阶段测试集的验证,两个性能指标的平均值分别为0.654和0.372。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Deep Learning Solution for Automatized Interpretation of 12-Lead ECGs
A broad variety of algorithms for detection and classification of rhythm and morphology abnormalities in ECG recordings have been proposed in the last years. Although some of them have reported very promising results, they have been mostly validated on short and non-public datasets, thus making their comparison extremely difficult. PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2020 provides an interesting opportunity to compare these and other algorithms on a wide set of ECG recordings. The present model was created by “ELBIT” team. The algorithm is based on deep learning, and the segmentation of all beats in the 12-lead ECG recording, generating a new signal for each one by concatenating sequentially the information found in each lead. The resulting signal is then transformed into a 2-D image through a continuous Wavelet transform and inputted to a convolutional neural network. According to the competition guidelines, classification results were evaluated in terms of a class-weighted F-score (Fβand a generalization of the Jaccard measure (Gβ). In average for all training signals, these metrics were 0.933 and 0.811, respectively. Regarding validation on the testing set from the first phase of the challenge, mean values for both performance indices were 0.654 and 0.372, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信