模式

J. Studd
{"title":"模式","authors":"J. Studd","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198719649.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relativism about quantifiers maintains that we never quantify over an absolutely comprehensive domain. Some philosophers are quick to reject this view on the grounds that it cannot be coherently formulated. But not every coherent theory can be captured in a single thesis. Sooner or later, everyone needs to make sense of theories that are infinitely axiomatized using schemas. This chapter offers a schematic regimentation of relativism. It then goes on to investigate the use of schemas to provide a relativist-friendly means to simulate absolutely general quantification. The chapter closes by discussing whether the relativist is able to frame an appropriate side-condition on the schema intended to capture her view.","PeriodicalId":272038,"journal":{"name":"Everything, more or less","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schemas\",\"authors\":\"J. Studd\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198719649.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relativism about quantifiers maintains that we never quantify over an absolutely comprehensive domain. Some philosophers are quick to reject this view on the grounds that it cannot be coherently formulated. But not every coherent theory can be captured in a single thesis. Sooner or later, everyone needs to make sense of theories that are infinitely axiomatized using schemas. This chapter offers a schematic regimentation of relativism. It then goes on to investigate the use of schemas to provide a relativist-friendly means to simulate absolutely general quantification. The chapter closes by discussing whether the relativist is able to frame an appropriate side-condition on the schema intended to capture her view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Everything, more or less\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Everything, more or less\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719649.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Everything, more or less","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719649.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于量词的相对主义认为,我们永远不会在一个绝对全面的领域内进行量化。一些哲学家很快就拒绝了这种观点,理由是它不能被连贯地表述出来。但并不是每一个连贯的理论都可以用一篇论文来概括。迟早,每个人都需要理解使用模式无限公理化的理论。本章提供了相对主义的示意图。然后继续研究模式的使用,以提供一种相对友好的方法来模拟绝对一般的量化。本章最后讨论了相对主义者是否能够在图式上建立一个适当的侧面条件,以捕捉她的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schemas
Relativism about quantifiers maintains that we never quantify over an absolutely comprehensive domain. Some philosophers are quick to reject this view on the grounds that it cannot be coherently formulated. But not every coherent theory can be captured in a single thesis. Sooner or later, everyone needs to make sense of theories that are infinitely axiomatized using schemas. This chapter offers a schematic regimentation of relativism. It then goes on to investigate the use of schemas to provide a relativist-friendly means to simulate absolutely general quantification. The chapter closes by discussing whether the relativist is able to frame an appropriate side-condition on the schema intended to capture her view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信