从单通道膀胱压力记录估计逼尿肌压力

M. Abdelhady, J. Han, S. Majerus, L. Brody, M. Damaser
{"title":"从单通道膀胱压力记录估计逼尿肌压力","authors":"M. Abdelhady, J. Han, S. Majerus, L. Brody, M. Damaser","doi":"10.1109/SPMB55497.2022.10014843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cystometry measures the behavior of the bladder and is frequently used to evaluate lower urinary tract abnormalities. Cystometry is conducted using two catheters, one in the bladder and the other in the vagina or rectum, which increases discomfort and complexity of the test. In this work we evaluated a method to estimate detrusor pressure (PDET), the pressure generated by a bladder contraction, from only a single catheter measuring vesical pressure (PVES). Using twenty urodynamic studies, we used statistical inference and wavelet multiresolution analysis to maximize the correlation coefficient $(R)$ between estimated PDET and calculated PDET after detecting and eliminating artifacts. Moreover, the estimator design considered a prospective real-time implementation. Root main square (RMS) error and correlation coefficient were used to evaluate algorithm accuracy in estimating $\\mathbf{P}_{\\text{DET}}$, while a statistical F -score evaluated the accuracy of artifact detection. The output of the proposed estimator compared with calculated PDET, and overall estimation performance showed that $RMS=10.7\\pm 2.1\\ \\text{cmH}_{2}\\mathrm{O}$ and $R=0.88\\pm$ 0.6 $(\\mathrm{N}=20)$. Moreover, detection accuracy for cough and Valsalva events were 99.5% and 84.30/0, respectively. We conclude that estimating PDET from PVES only is feasible making single channel cystometry a possibility.","PeriodicalId":261445,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detrusor Pressure Estimation from Single Channel Bladder Pressure Recordings\",\"authors\":\"M. Abdelhady, J. Han, S. Majerus, L. Brody, M. Damaser\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPMB55497.2022.10014843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cystometry measures the behavior of the bladder and is frequently used to evaluate lower urinary tract abnormalities. Cystometry is conducted using two catheters, one in the bladder and the other in the vagina or rectum, which increases discomfort and complexity of the test. In this work we evaluated a method to estimate detrusor pressure (PDET), the pressure generated by a bladder contraction, from only a single catheter measuring vesical pressure (PVES). Using twenty urodynamic studies, we used statistical inference and wavelet multiresolution analysis to maximize the correlation coefficient $(R)$ between estimated PDET and calculated PDET after detecting and eliminating artifacts. Moreover, the estimator design considered a prospective real-time implementation. Root main square (RMS) error and correlation coefficient were used to evaluate algorithm accuracy in estimating $\\\\mathbf{P}_{\\\\text{DET}}$, while a statistical F -score evaluated the accuracy of artifact detection. The output of the proposed estimator compared with calculated PDET, and overall estimation performance showed that $RMS=10.7\\\\pm 2.1\\\\ \\\\text{cmH}_{2}\\\\mathrm{O}$ and $R=0.88\\\\pm$ 0.6 $(\\\\mathrm{N}=20)$. Moreover, detection accuracy for cough and Valsalva events were 99.5% and 84.30/0, respectively. We conclude that estimating PDET from PVES only is feasible making single channel cystometry a possibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB55497.2022.10014843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB55497.2022.10014843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

膀胱测量术测量膀胱的行为,经常用于评估下尿路异常。膀胱术使用两根导管,一根在膀胱,另一根在阴道或直肠,这增加了不适和测试的复杂性。在这项工作中,我们评估了一种估算逼尿肌压力(PDET)的方法,该压力是由膀胱收缩产生的压力,仅通过单根导管测量膀胱压力(PVES)。使用20个尿动力学研究,我们使用统计推断和小波多分辨率分析来最大化检测和消除伪影后估计PDET和计算PDET之间的相关系数$(R)$。此外,估计器的设计考虑了未来的实时实现。在估计$\mathbf{P}_{\text{DET}}$时,采用均方根误差(RMS)和相关系数评价算法的准确性,采用统计F分数评价伪像检测的准确性。将所提估计器的输出与计算得到的PDET进行比较,整体估计性能表明$RMS=10.7\pm 2.1\ \text{cmH}_{2}\mathrm{O}$和$R=0.88\pm$ 0.6 $(\mathrm{N}=20)$。咳嗽和Valsalva事件的检出率分别为99.5%和84.30/0。我们得出结论,仅从PVES估计PDET是可行的,使单通道膀胱术成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detrusor Pressure Estimation from Single Channel Bladder Pressure Recordings
Cystometry measures the behavior of the bladder and is frequently used to evaluate lower urinary tract abnormalities. Cystometry is conducted using two catheters, one in the bladder and the other in the vagina or rectum, which increases discomfort and complexity of the test. In this work we evaluated a method to estimate detrusor pressure (PDET), the pressure generated by a bladder contraction, from only a single catheter measuring vesical pressure (PVES). Using twenty urodynamic studies, we used statistical inference and wavelet multiresolution analysis to maximize the correlation coefficient $(R)$ between estimated PDET and calculated PDET after detecting and eliminating artifacts. Moreover, the estimator design considered a prospective real-time implementation. Root main square (RMS) error and correlation coefficient were used to evaluate algorithm accuracy in estimating $\mathbf{P}_{\text{DET}}$, while a statistical F -score evaluated the accuracy of artifact detection. The output of the proposed estimator compared with calculated PDET, and overall estimation performance showed that $RMS=10.7\pm 2.1\ \text{cmH}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ and $R=0.88\pm$ 0.6 $(\mathrm{N}=20)$. Moreover, detection accuracy for cough and Valsalva events were 99.5% and 84.30/0, respectively. We conclude that estimating PDET from PVES only is feasible making single channel cystometry a possibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信