强制医疗保险患者是否需要等待更长时间?保险状况对德国住院医疗部门获得医疗服务的影响

D. Sauerland, Bjoern A. Kuchinke, A. Wübker
{"title":"强制医疗保险患者是否需要等待更长时间?保险状况对德国住院医疗部门获得医疗服务的影响","authors":"D. Sauerland, Bjoern A. Kuchinke, A. Wübker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1117846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: International studies (e.g. Asplin et al. 2005) show that waiting time for inpatient treatment depends on how the claimed services are financed. In Germany there is an ongoing debate about the assumption that privately insured patients do not only receive more benefits than members of the statutory health insurance but that they also have better access to diagnosis and treatment services. This assumption is also supported by a current study (WIdO 2006) for the German outpatient sector. Problem: Existing analysis of the determinants for waiting times in Germany are essentially based on the questioning of patients and do not cover the inpatient sector. This paper aims to fill both gaps by (i) generating new primary data and (ii) analyzing waiting times in German hospitals. Methods: We selected 3 diagnoses for medical problems, where treatment has to be started at short notice. The diagnoses were taken from gynecology (cervical conization for PAP III D), cardiology (stenosis) and surgery (Weber B fracture). For these diagnoses, anonymous telephone calls were performed to make an appointment for inpatient treatment. Altogether, 687 hospitals were included in the study. The interviewers recorded, (i) whether or not the hospitals asked actively if the caller was privately insured and (ii) the time between the call and the appointed date for treatment. The data was then analyzed econometrically to find out if the kind of insurance had an impact on the waiting time. Methods applied were T-Test for paired samples and Mcnemars test respectively. Results: The results show that 25 percent of the hospitals actively ask for the kind of insurance coverage, that patients have. Within this group of hospitals, the average waiting time for a treatment appointment is significantly longer for members of the statutory health insurance funds. Whereas 41 percent of privately insured patients received a date for treatment within one week after the appointment call, only 28 percent of the statutory health insured patients got a date in that period of time. On average, they have to wait 1,6 days longer for an treatment than those privately insured. Conclusion: The results introduced here may be of interest for political decision makers. This not only applies before the background of basic discussions repeatedly held in Germany with regard to a two-class medical system, which also include the access to medical services.","PeriodicalId":177602,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Patients with Compulsory Health Insurance have to Wait Longer? The Influence of the Insurance Status on the Access to Medical Services in the In-Patient Care Sector in Germany\",\"authors\":\"D. Sauerland, Bjoern A. Kuchinke, A. Wübker\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1117846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: International studies (e.g. Asplin et al. 2005) show that waiting time for inpatient treatment depends on how the claimed services are financed. In Germany there is an ongoing debate about the assumption that privately insured patients do not only receive more benefits than members of the statutory health insurance but that they also have better access to diagnosis and treatment services. This assumption is also supported by a current study (WIdO 2006) for the German outpatient sector. Problem: Existing analysis of the determinants for waiting times in Germany are essentially based on the questioning of patients and do not cover the inpatient sector. This paper aims to fill both gaps by (i) generating new primary data and (ii) analyzing waiting times in German hospitals. Methods: We selected 3 diagnoses for medical problems, where treatment has to be started at short notice. The diagnoses were taken from gynecology (cervical conization for PAP III D), cardiology (stenosis) and surgery (Weber B fracture). For these diagnoses, anonymous telephone calls were performed to make an appointment for inpatient treatment. Altogether, 687 hospitals were included in the study. The interviewers recorded, (i) whether or not the hospitals asked actively if the caller was privately insured and (ii) the time between the call and the appointed date for treatment. The data was then analyzed econometrically to find out if the kind of insurance had an impact on the waiting time. Methods applied were T-Test for paired samples and Mcnemars test respectively. Results: The results show that 25 percent of the hospitals actively ask for the kind of insurance coverage, that patients have. Within this group of hospitals, the average waiting time for a treatment appointment is significantly longer for members of the statutory health insurance funds. Whereas 41 percent of privately insured patients received a date for treatment within one week after the appointment call, only 28 percent of the statutory health insured patients got a date in that period of time. On average, they have to wait 1,6 days longer for an treatment than those privately insured. Conclusion: The results introduced here may be of interest for political decision makers. This not only applies before the background of basic discussions repeatedly held in Germany with regard to a two-class medical system, which also include the access to medical services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1117846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1117846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际研究(如Asplin et al. 2005)表明,住院治疗的等待时间取决于所申请服务的融资方式。在德国,关于私人保险患者不仅比法定健康保险成员获得更多福利,而且他们也有更好的机会获得诊断和治疗服务的假设正在进行辩论。这一假设也支持目前的研究(WIdO 2006)对德国门诊部门。问题:对德国等待时间决定因素的现有分析基本上是基于对病人的询问,没有涵盖住院部门。本文旨在通过(i)生成新的原始数据和(ii)分析德国医院的等待时间来填补这两个空白。方法:我们选择3例诊断为医疗问题,其中必须在短时间内开始治疗。诊断来自妇科(PAP III D颈椎锥切术)、心脏科(狭窄)和外科(Weber B骨折)。对于这些诊断,进行匿名电话预约住院治疗。总共有687家医院被纳入研究。采访者记录了(i)医院是否主动询问来电者是否有私人保险,以及(ii)来电者与预约治疗日期之间的时间。然后对数据进行计量分析,以确定保险类型是否对等待时间有影响。方法采用配对样本t检验和Mcnemars检验。结果:结果显示,25%的医院主动要求患者所拥有的保险种类。在这类医院中,法定健康保险基金成员预约治疗的平均等待时间要长得多。41%的私人保险患者在预约电话后一周内得到了治疗日期,而只有28%的法定健康保险患者在这段时间内得到了日期。平均而言,他们要比那些私人保险的人多等待1.6天的治疗时间。结论:本文介绍的结果可能对政治决策者感兴趣。这不仅适用于德国多次就两级医疗制度进行基本讨论的背景,其中还包括获得医疗服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Patients with Compulsory Health Insurance have to Wait Longer? The Influence of the Insurance Status on the Access to Medical Services in the In-Patient Care Sector in Germany
Background: International studies (e.g. Asplin et al. 2005) show that waiting time for inpatient treatment depends on how the claimed services are financed. In Germany there is an ongoing debate about the assumption that privately insured patients do not only receive more benefits than members of the statutory health insurance but that they also have better access to diagnosis and treatment services. This assumption is also supported by a current study (WIdO 2006) for the German outpatient sector. Problem: Existing analysis of the determinants for waiting times in Germany are essentially based on the questioning of patients and do not cover the inpatient sector. This paper aims to fill both gaps by (i) generating new primary data and (ii) analyzing waiting times in German hospitals. Methods: We selected 3 diagnoses for medical problems, where treatment has to be started at short notice. The diagnoses were taken from gynecology (cervical conization for PAP III D), cardiology (stenosis) and surgery (Weber B fracture). For these diagnoses, anonymous telephone calls were performed to make an appointment for inpatient treatment. Altogether, 687 hospitals were included in the study. The interviewers recorded, (i) whether or not the hospitals asked actively if the caller was privately insured and (ii) the time between the call and the appointed date for treatment. The data was then analyzed econometrically to find out if the kind of insurance had an impact on the waiting time. Methods applied were T-Test for paired samples and Mcnemars test respectively. Results: The results show that 25 percent of the hospitals actively ask for the kind of insurance coverage, that patients have. Within this group of hospitals, the average waiting time for a treatment appointment is significantly longer for members of the statutory health insurance funds. Whereas 41 percent of privately insured patients received a date for treatment within one week after the appointment call, only 28 percent of the statutory health insured patients got a date in that period of time. On average, they have to wait 1,6 days longer for an treatment than those privately insured. Conclusion: The results introduced here may be of interest for political decision makers. This not only applies before the background of basic discussions repeatedly held in Germany with regard to a two-class medical system, which also include the access to medical services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信