关于麦凯博士论文《科学信息的量子方面》的讨论

D. Mackay
{"title":"关于麦凯博士论文《科学信息的量子方面》的讨论","authors":"D. Mackay","doi":"10.1109/TIT.1953.1188583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Could Mr. MacKay clarify the trend of his paaper in its relation to the preceding paper by Dr. Gabor, and to Lord Cherr!ell's work, referred to by a previous speaker, on the interpretation of quantum theory? Whereas Dr. Gabor had started from quantum theory and deduced the ultimate 'bits' of communication theory from it, Mr. MacKay seemed to be starting from the other end, and attempting to deduce quanta from logical analysis into atomic propositions. Mr. MacKay would perhaps agree that this logical approach at beat left an undetermined constant which could only be obtained by experiment.","PeriodicalId":134468,"journal":{"name":"Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1953-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussion on Dr. Mackay's paper on 'Quantum Aspects of Scientific Information'\",\"authors\":\"D. Mackay\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIT.1953.1188583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Could Mr. MacKay clarify the trend of his paaper in its relation to the preceding paper by Dr. Gabor, and to Lord Cherr!ell's work, referred to by a previous speaker, on the interpretation of quantum theory? Whereas Dr. Gabor had started from quantum theory and deduced the ultimate 'bits' of communication theory from it, Mr. MacKay seemed to be starting from the other end, and attempting to deduce quanta from logical analysis into atomic propositions. Mr. MacKay would perhaps agree that this logical approach at beat left an undetermined constant which could only be obtained by experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1953-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1953.1188583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1953.1188583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

麦凯先生能否澄清一下他的论文与前一篇Gabor博士和Cherr勋爵的论文的关系?上一位发言者提到的,关于量子理论解释的厄尔的工作?Gabor博士是从量子理论出发,并由此推导出了通信理论的终极“比特”,而麦凯先生似乎是从另一端出发,试图从逻辑分析中推导出量子到原子命题。麦凯先生也许会同意,这种逻辑方法在本质上留下了一个只能通过实验获得的未定常数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discussion on Dr. Mackay's paper on 'Quantum Aspects of Scientific Information'
Could Mr. MacKay clarify the trend of his paaper in its relation to the preceding paper by Dr. Gabor, and to Lord Cherr!ell's work, referred to by a previous speaker, on the interpretation of quantum theory? Whereas Dr. Gabor had started from quantum theory and deduced the ultimate 'bits' of communication theory from it, Mr. MacKay seemed to be starting from the other end, and attempting to deduce quanta from logical analysis into atomic propositions. Mr. MacKay would perhaps agree that this logical approach at beat left an undetermined constant which could only be obtained by experiment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信