了解全球恐怖主义事件的不规律

Joy M Mirasol, Christian J. Inovejas, Joan M Recente
{"title":"了解全球恐怖主义事件的不规律","authors":"Joy M Mirasol, Christian J. Inovejas, Joan M Recente","doi":"10.57200/apjsbs.v12i0.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to explain underlying causes of the persistence of terrorism incidents worldwide. A dataset (1970-2013) from the Global Terrorism Database of the University of Maryland was used through new methodologies embedded in a fractal analysis. Fractal analysis enables one to discover essential differences between the most frequently occurring values and the least occurring values, in effect, describing the emergent ruggedness of the data. Such ruggedness is summarized in terms of a quantity called fractal dimension.  The fractality of the terrorist incidents was determined for the decades 1970-1979, 19801989, 1990-1999, 2000-2009 and 2010-2013.  When the datasets of countries with the most significant events were compared per decade, a pattern showed that the common cause for the occurrence of the terrorist incident can be attributed to the marginalization of people/groups and economic discrimination. Further analysis also showed that other causes are associated with the marginalization issues that may be a result of interweaving factors relating to or encompassing economic, political, religious, cultural/historical, and ideological causes.   Also, terrorism incidents can be explained utilizing the concept of détente as an alternative to the concept of balance of power.Keywords and phrases:  Fractal analysis, detente, balance of power, terrorism, marginalization ","PeriodicalId":233251,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Irregularities of Global Terrorism Incidents\",\"authors\":\"Joy M Mirasol, Christian J. Inovejas, Joan M Recente\",\"doi\":\"10.57200/apjsbs.v12i0.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study seeks to explain underlying causes of the persistence of terrorism incidents worldwide. A dataset (1970-2013) from the Global Terrorism Database of the University of Maryland was used through new methodologies embedded in a fractal analysis. Fractal analysis enables one to discover essential differences between the most frequently occurring values and the least occurring values, in effect, describing the emergent ruggedness of the data. Such ruggedness is summarized in terms of a quantity called fractal dimension.  The fractality of the terrorist incidents was determined for the decades 1970-1979, 19801989, 1990-1999, 2000-2009 and 2010-2013.  When the datasets of countries with the most significant events were compared per decade, a pattern showed that the common cause for the occurrence of the terrorist incident can be attributed to the marginalization of people/groups and economic discrimination. Further analysis also showed that other causes are associated with the marginalization issues that may be a result of interweaving factors relating to or encompassing economic, political, religious, cultural/historical, and ideological causes.   Also, terrorism incidents can be explained utilizing the concept of détente as an alternative to the concept of balance of power.Keywords and phrases:  Fractal analysis, detente, balance of power, terrorism, marginalization \",\"PeriodicalId\":233251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57200/apjsbs.v12i0.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57200/apjsbs.v12i0.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究试图解释世界范围内恐怖主义事件持续发生的根本原因。马里兰大学全球恐怖主义数据库的数据集(1970-2013)通过嵌入分形分析的新方法进行使用。分形分析使人们能够发现最频繁出现的值和最少出现的值之间的本质差异,实际上,描述了数据的突现性。这种坚固性可以用一个叫做分形维数的量来概括。在1970-1979年、1980 - 1989年、1990-1999年、2000-2009年和2010-2013年期间确定了恐怖事件的数量。当对每十年发生最重大事件的国家的数据集进行比较时,一种模式表明,恐怖主义事件发生的共同原因可归因于人/群体的边缘化和经济歧视。进一步的分析还表明,与边缘化问题有关的其他原因可能是与经济、政治、宗教、文化/历史和意识形态原因有关或包括这些原因的交织因素的结果。此外,恐怖主义事件也可以用dsamtente的概念来解释,作为权力平衡概念的替代办法。关键词:分形分析,缓和,力量平衡,恐怖主义,边缘化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Irregularities of Global Terrorism Incidents
This study seeks to explain underlying causes of the persistence of terrorism incidents worldwide. A dataset (1970-2013) from the Global Terrorism Database of the University of Maryland was used through new methodologies embedded in a fractal analysis. Fractal analysis enables one to discover essential differences between the most frequently occurring values and the least occurring values, in effect, describing the emergent ruggedness of the data. Such ruggedness is summarized in terms of a quantity called fractal dimension.  The fractality of the terrorist incidents was determined for the decades 1970-1979, 19801989, 1990-1999, 2000-2009 and 2010-2013.  When the datasets of countries with the most significant events were compared per decade, a pattern showed that the common cause for the occurrence of the terrorist incident can be attributed to the marginalization of people/groups and economic discrimination. Further analysis also showed that other causes are associated with the marginalization issues that may be a result of interweaving factors relating to or encompassing economic, political, religious, cultural/historical, and ideological causes.   Also, terrorism incidents can be explained utilizing the concept of détente as an alternative to the concept of balance of power.Keywords and phrases:  Fractal analysis, detente, balance of power, terrorism, marginalization 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信