构建电子科学安全框架

Andrew P. Martin, J. Davies, Steve Harris
{"title":"构建电子科学安全框架","authors":"Andrew P. Martin, J. Davies, Steve Harris","doi":"10.1109/ESCIENCE.2010.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an approach to the formulation and classification of security requirements in eScience. It explains why it is untenable to suggest that `one size fits all', and that what is an appropriate security solution in one context may not be at all appropriate in another. It proposes a framework for the description of eScience security in a number of different dimensions, in terms of measures taken and controls achieved. A distinctive feature of the framework is that these descriptions are organised into a set of discrete criteria, in most cases presented as levels of increasing assurance. The intended framework should serve as a basis for the systematic analysis of security solutions, facilitating the processes of design and approval, as well as for the identification of expectations and best practice in particular domains. The possible usage of the framework, and the value of the approach, is demonstrated in the paper through application to the design of a national data sharing service.","PeriodicalId":441488,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Sixth International Conference on e-Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Framework for Security in eScience\",\"authors\":\"Andrew P. Martin, J. Davies, Steve Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESCIENCE.2010.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes an approach to the formulation and classification of security requirements in eScience. It explains why it is untenable to suggest that `one size fits all', and that what is an appropriate security solution in one context may not be at all appropriate in another. It proposes a framework for the description of eScience security in a number of different dimensions, in terms of measures taken and controls achieved. A distinctive feature of the framework is that these descriptions are organised into a set of discrete criteria, in most cases presented as levels of increasing assurance. The intended framework should serve as a basis for the systematic analysis of security solutions, facilitating the processes of design and approval, as well as for the identification of expectations and best practice in particular domains. The possible usage of the framework, and the value of the approach, is demonstrated in the paper through application to the design of a national data sharing service.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE Sixth International Conference on e-Science\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE Sixth International Conference on e-Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCIENCE.2010.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Sixth International Conference on e-Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCIENCE.2010.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文描述了eScience中安全需求的表述和分类方法。它解释了为什么“一刀切”的建议是站不住脚的,并且在一个上下文中合适的安全解决方案可能完全不适合另一个上下文中。它提出了一个框架来描述eScience安全性在许多不同的维度,在采取的措施和实现的控制方面。该框架的一个显著特征是,这些描述被组织成一组离散的标准,在大多数情况下呈现为增加保证的级别。预期的框架应作为安全解决方案系统分析的基础,促进设计和批准过程,以及确定特定领域的期望和最佳实践。本文通过应用于国家数据共享服务的设计,论证了该框架的可能用途和方法的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a Framework for Security in eScience
This paper describes an approach to the formulation and classification of security requirements in eScience. It explains why it is untenable to suggest that `one size fits all', and that what is an appropriate security solution in one context may not be at all appropriate in another. It proposes a framework for the description of eScience security in a number of different dimensions, in terms of measures taken and controls achieved. A distinctive feature of the framework is that these descriptions are organised into a set of discrete criteria, in most cases presented as levels of increasing assurance. The intended framework should serve as a basis for the systematic analysis of security solutions, facilitating the processes of design and approval, as well as for the identification of expectations and best practice in particular domains. The possible usage of the framework, and the value of the approach, is demonstrated in the paper through application to the design of a national data sharing service.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信