{"title":"从记忆图像中获取HTML5网络浏览器中网络存储的证据","authors":"Shinichi Matsumoto, K. Sakurai","doi":"10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2014.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web browser is a growing platform for the execution of various applications. There are large fractions of smartphone platforms that support the execution of web technology based application, especially one such as HTML 5. However there are also some emerging smartphone platforms that only support web technology based applications. Taking into the considerations of these situations may lead to a higher importance of forensic investigations on artifacts within the web browser bringing about the usefulness of the HTML5 specific attributes as evidences in mobile forensics. Through this paper, we explore the results of experiments that acquire the main memory image within terminal and extract the webStorage data as an evidence of the browsing activity. The memory forensics of web browsing activity is highly concerned. The evidences gathered from the HTML5 webStorage contents acquired from the main memory image are examined and the results of the observations indicate the ability to retrieve webStorage from the memory image is certain. Therefore, we proclaimed formats of evidences that are retrievable from the main memory. The formats were different depending on the type of web browser accessed. Three most utilized web browsers are experimented in this paper namely, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Microsoft Internet Explorer. The results showed that the acquisition of webStorage content on the browsers were possible and elucidated its formats. Values of webStorage is contained in the residuals that left by all of three web browsers. Therefore, if the investigator has the knowledge of values, he will be able to find the location of the evidence to hint values. If the investigator does not have the knowledge about the value, then he can explore the evidence based on the knowledge of the origin or key. Because the format of the evidence depends on Web browser, investigator must use different search techniques according to the Web browser.","PeriodicalId":354543,"journal":{"name":"2014 Ninth Asia Joint Conference on Information Security","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acquisition of Evidence of Web Storage in HTML5 Web Browsers from Memory Image\",\"authors\":\"Shinichi Matsumoto, K. Sakurai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2014.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Web browser is a growing platform for the execution of various applications. There are large fractions of smartphone platforms that support the execution of web technology based application, especially one such as HTML 5. However there are also some emerging smartphone platforms that only support web technology based applications. Taking into the considerations of these situations may lead to a higher importance of forensic investigations on artifacts within the web browser bringing about the usefulness of the HTML5 specific attributes as evidences in mobile forensics. Through this paper, we explore the results of experiments that acquire the main memory image within terminal and extract the webStorage data as an evidence of the browsing activity. The memory forensics of web browsing activity is highly concerned. The evidences gathered from the HTML5 webStorage contents acquired from the main memory image are examined and the results of the observations indicate the ability to retrieve webStorage from the memory image is certain. Therefore, we proclaimed formats of evidences that are retrievable from the main memory. The formats were different depending on the type of web browser accessed. Three most utilized web browsers are experimented in this paper namely, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Microsoft Internet Explorer. The results showed that the acquisition of webStorage content on the browsers were possible and elucidated its formats. Values of webStorage is contained in the residuals that left by all of three web browsers. Therefore, if the investigator has the knowledge of values, he will be able to find the location of the evidence to hint values. If the investigator does not have the knowledge about the value, then he can explore the evidence based on the knowledge of the origin or key. Because the format of the evidence depends on Web browser, investigator must use different search techniques according to the Web browser.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Ninth Asia Joint Conference on Information Security\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Ninth Asia Joint Conference on Information Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2014.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Ninth Asia Joint Conference on Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2014.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
Web浏览器是执行各种应用程序的一个不断发展的平台。有很大一部分智能手机平台支持基于web技术的应用程序的执行,尤其是HTML 5。然而,也有一些新兴的智能手机平台只支持基于web技术的应用程序。考虑到这些情况,可能会导致对web浏览器内的工件的取证调查变得更加重要,从而带来HTML5特定属性作为移动取证证据的有用性。通过本文,我们探索了在终端内获取主存储器图像并提取webStorage数据作为浏览活动证据的实验结果。web浏览活动的内存取证备受关注。对从主记忆图像中获取的HTML5 webStorage内容收集的证据进行了检查,观察结果表明,从记忆图像中检索webStorage的能力是确定的。因此,我们宣布了从主存储器中可检索的证据格式。格式根据访问的web浏览器类型而不同。本文实验了三种最常用的网页浏览器,即Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox和Microsoft Internet Explorer。结果表明,在浏览器上获取webStorage内容是可能的,并阐明了其格式。webStorage的值包含在所有三个web浏览器留下的残差中。因此,如果侦查人员有价值的知识,他将能够找到证据提示价值的位置。如果调查人员不知道价值,那么他可以根据对来源或关键的了解来探索证据。由于证据的格式依赖于网络浏览器,侦查人员必须根据不同的浏览器使用不同的检索技术。
Acquisition of Evidence of Web Storage in HTML5 Web Browsers from Memory Image
Web browser is a growing platform for the execution of various applications. There are large fractions of smartphone platforms that support the execution of web technology based application, especially one such as HTML 5. However there are also some emerging smartphone platforms that only support web technology based applications. Taking into the considerations of these situations may lead to a higher importance of forensic investigations on artifacts within the web browser bringing about the usefulness of the HTML5 specific attributes as evidences in mobile forensics. Through this paper, we explore the results of experiments that acquire the main memory image within terminal and extract the webStorage data as an evidence of the browsing activity. The memory forensics of web browsing activity is highly concerned. The evidences gathered from the HTML5 webStorage contents acquired from the main memory image are examined and the results of the observations indicate the ability to retrieve webStorage from the memory image is certain. Therefore, we proclaimed formats of evidences that are retrievable from the main memory. The formats were different depending on the type of web browser accessed. Three most utilized web browsers are experimented in this paper namely, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Microsoft Internet Explorer. The results showed that the acquisition of webStorage content on the browsers were possible and elucidated its formats. Values of webStorage is contained in the residuals that left by all of three web browsers. Therefore, if the investigator has the knowledge of values, he will be able to find the location of the evidence to hint values. If the investigator does not have the knowledge about the value, then he can explore the evidence based on the knowledge of the origin or key. Because the format of the evidence depends on Web browser, investigator must use different search techniques according to the Web browser.