感觉调节对患者痛苦的影响和使用限制干预在成人住院精神病设置:一个重要的回顾

H. Alhaj, Adam Trist
{"title":"感觉调节对患者痛苦的影响和使用限制干预在成人住院精神病设置:一个重要的回顾","authors":"H. Alhaj, Adam Trist","doi":"10.4103/abhs.abhs_52_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within a psychiatric inpatient setting, restrictive interventions may be used for managing disturbed behaviors. However, the restrictive practice can be traumatic and may carry risks to patients and staff. Evidence is growing for the use of sensory modulation in mental health, yet in a general adult psychiatric inpatient setting, the effect on reducing distress and restrictive practice is not fully ascertained. An electronic literature search was conducted to identify the impact of sensory modulation as a therapeutic measure to reduce the need for more restrictive interventions. Studies of varying designs were identified, with key relevant outcomes including seclusion events, seclusion duration, patient distress, and staff and patient feedback. Reduction in the percentage of patients needing seclusion, reduced patient distress levels, and favorable feedback from staff and patients were identified. However, conflicting results of seclusion events were demonstrated. The findings from this review are promising for the therapeutic benefits of sensory modulation in adult inpatient settings. Further studies are warranted, particularly to evaluate the multiple static and dynamic environmental factors that may influence restrictive practice in inpatient settings.","PeriodicalId":158834,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of sensory modulation on patient's distress and use of restrictive interventions in adult inpatient psychiatric settings: A critical review\",\"authors\":\"H. Alhaj, Adam Trist\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/abhs.abhs_52_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within a psychiatric inpatient setting, restrictive interventions may be used for managing disturbed behaviors. However, the restrictive practice can be traumatic and may carry risks to patients and staff. Evidence is growing for the use of sensory modulation in mental health, yet in a general adult psychiatric inpatient setting, the effect on reducing distress and restrictive practice is not fully ascertained. An electronic literature search was conducted to identify the impact of sensory modulation as a therapeutic measure to reduce the need for more restrictive interventions. Studies of varying designs were identified, with key relevant outcomes including seclusion events, seclusion duration, patient distress, and staff and patient feedback. Reduction in the percentage of patients needing seclusion, reduced patient distress levels, and favorable feedback from staff and patients were identified. However, conflicting results of seclusion events were demonstrated. The findings from this review are promising for the therapeutic benefits of sensory modulation in adult inpatient settings. Further studies are warranted, particularly to evaluate the multiple static and dynamic environmental factors that may influence restrictive practice in inpatient settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/abhs.abhs_52_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abhs.abhs_52_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在精神病住院病人的设置,限制性干预可能用于管理干扰行为。然而,这种限制性做法可能会造成创伤,并可能给患者和工作人员带来风险。越来越多的证据表明,在心理健康中使用感觉调节,但在一般成人精神病住院患者环境中,对减少痛苦和限制性做法的影响尚未完全确定。进行了电子文献检索,以确定感觉调节作为一种治疗措施的影响,以减少对更多限制性干预的需求。确定了不同设计的研究,关键相关结果包括隔离事件、隔离时间、患者痛苦、工作人员和患者反馈。减少了需要隔离的患者比例,降低了患者的痛苦程度,并得到了工作人员和患者的良好反馈。然而,隔离事件的结果却相互矛盾。本综述的研究结果对感觉调节在成人住院患者中的治疗效果很有希望。进一步的研究是有必要的,特别是评估多种静态和动态环境因素,这些因素可能会影响住院患者的限制性做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of sensory modulation on patient's distress and use of restrictive interventions in adult inpatient psychiatric settings: A critical review
Within a psychiatric inpatient setting, restrictive interventions may be used for managing disturbed behaviors. However, the restrictive practice can be traumatic and may carry risks to patients and staff. Evidence is growing for the use of sensory modulation in mental health, yet in a general adult psychiatric inpatient setting, the effect on reducing distress and restrictive practice is not fully ascertained. An electronic literature search was conducted to identify the impact of sensory modulation as a therapeutic measure to reduce the need for more restrictive interventions. Studies of varying designs were identified, with key relevant outcomes including seclusion events, seclusion duration, patient distress, and staff and patient feedback. Reduction in the percentage of patients needing seclusion, reduced patient distress levels, and favorable feedback from staff and patients were identified. However, conflicting results of seclusion events were demonstrated. The findings from this review are promising for the therapeutic benefits of sensory modulation in adult inpatient settings. Further studies are warranted, particularly to evaluate the multiple static and dynamic environmental factors that may influence restrictive practice in inpatient settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信