LDPC-LDGM和Raptor编码在超大块大小PL-FEC中的效率比较

Rafael Montalban Gutierrez, G. Seco-Granados
{"title":"LDPC-LDGM和Raptor编码在超大块大小PL-FEC中的效率比较","authors":"Rafael Montalban Gutierrez, G. Seco-Granados","doi":"10.1109/WTS.2009.5068986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the performance of LDPC-LDGM codes and Raptor codes is studied and compared in terms of efficiency. LDPC-LDGM and Raptor are FEC codifications that can be applied at packet level. PL-FEC consists in including redundant packets in the transmission to ensure correct reception. Althought these techniques have been previously studied in the literature, they have usually been compared with the performance of small block Reed Solomon codes. This paper presents a novel comparison between the performance of LDPC-LDGM codes and Raptor codes as alternatives for packet level FEC when large codification blocks are needed. The results obtained show that Raptor codes clearly outperform LDPC-LDGM codes in almost all scenarios.","PeriodicalId":313087,"journal":{"name":"2009 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency comparison of LDPC-LDGM and Raptor codes for PL-FEC with very large block sizes\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Montalban Gutierrez, G. Seco-Granados\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WTS.2009.5068986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the performance of LDPC-LDGM codes and Raptor codes is studied and compared in terms of efficiency. LDPC-LDGM and Raptor are FEC codifications that can be applied at packet level. PL-FEC consists in including redundant packets in the transmission to ensure correct reception. Althought these techniques have been previously studied in the literature, they have usually been compared with the performance of small block Reed Solomon codes. This paper presents a novel comparison between the performance of LDPC-LDGM codes and Raptor codes as alternatives for packet level FEC when large codification blocks are needed. The results obtained show that Raptor codes clearly outperform LDPC-LDGM codes in almost all scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WTS.2009.5068986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WTS.2009.5068986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对LDPC-LDGM码和Raptor码的性能进行了研究,并在效率方面进行了比较。LDPC-LDGM和Raptor是FEC编码,可以应用于数据包级别。PL-FEC包括在传输中包含冗余数据包以确保正确接收。虽然这些技术以前已经在文献中进行了研究,但它们通常与小块Reed Solomon码的性能进行比较。本文提出了一种新颖的比较LDPC-LDGM码和Raptor码在需要大量编码块时作为分组级FEC的替代方案的性能。结果表明,Raptor编码在几乎所有场景下都明显优于LDPC-LDGM编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency comparison of LDPC-LDGM and Raptor codes for PL-FEC with very large block sizes
In this paper the performance of LDPC-LDGM codes and Raptor codes is studied and compared in terms of efficiency. LDPC-LDGM and Raptor are FEC codifications that can be applied at packet level. PL-FEC consists in including redundant packets in the transmission to ensure correct reception. Althought these techniques have been previously studied in the literature, they have usually been compared with the performance of small block Reed Solomon codes. This paper presents a novel comparison between the performance of LDPC-LDGM codes and Raptor codes as alternatives for packet level FEC when large codification blocks are needed. The results obtained show that Raptor codes clearly outperform LDPC-LDGM codes in almost all scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信