基于应变与基于能量的蠕变破坏模拟比较

S. Kim, Y. Oh, Yun‐Jae Kim
{"title":"基于应变与基于能量的蠕变破坏模拟比较","authors":"S. Kim, Y. Oh, Yun‐Jae Kim","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The power plant is required to operate under high temperature and pressure for high efficiency. In order to predict reliable life time of power plant under high temperature, creep-low cycle fatigue life prediction method should be proposed.\n In this paper, strain based and energy based failure model are proposed to simulate notch bar creep tensile test. Modification factors considering multiaxial fracture and strain rate effect were proposed in order to simulate notch bar creep tensile test using FE analysis.\n Using proposed models, FE result of strain based and energy based damage model are compared with notch bar creep tensile test. As a result, both strain and energy based damage model simulates crack growth well during creep, However, when tertiary creep behavior is considered, energy based failure model simulate rupture time longer than strain based model. It can be inferred that plastic damage accumulation of energy based model is slower than that of strain based model.","PeriodicalId":428760,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Strain-Based and Energy-Based Creep Failure Simulation\",\"authors\":\"S. Kim, Y. Oh, Yun‐Jae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/PVP2018-84569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The power plant is required to operate under high temperature and pressure for high efficiency. In order to predict reliable life time of power plant under high temperature, creep-low cycle fatigue life prediction method should be proposed.\\n In this paper, strain based and energy based failure model are proposed to simulate notch bar creep tensile test. Modification factors considering multiaxial fracture and strain rate effect were proposed in order to simulate notch bar creep tensile test using FE analysis.\\n Using proposed models, FE result of strain based and energy based damage model are compared with notch bar creep tensile test. As a result, both strain and energy based damage model simulates crack growth well during creep, However, when tertiary creep behavior is considered, energy based failure model simulate rupture time longer than strain based model. It can be inferred that plastic damage accumulation of energy based model is slower than that of strain based model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高发电效率,电厂需要在高温高压下运行。为了预测电厂在高温下的可靠寿命,应提出蠕变-低循环疲劳寿命预测方法。本文提出了基于应变和基于能量的破坏模型来模拟缺口棒的蠕变拉伸试验。为了模拟缺口棒蠕变拉伸试验,提出了考虑多轴断裂和应变率效应的修正因素。利用所提出的模型,将应变损伤模型和能量损伤模型的有限元结果与缺口棒蠕变拉伸试验结果进行了比较。结果表明,基于应变和能量的损伤模型均能较好地模拟蠕变过程中的裂纹扩展,但当考虑三级蠕变行为时,基于能量的破坏模型比基于应变的破坏模型模拟的破裂时间更长。可以推断,基于能量的模型的塑性损伤积累速度要慢于基于应变的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Strain-Based and Energy-Based Creep Failure Simulation
The power plant is required to operate under high temperature and pressure for high efficiency. In order to predict reliable life time of power plant under high temperature, creep-low cycle fatigue life prediction method should be proposed. In this paper, strain based and energy based failure model are proposed to simulate notch bar creep tensile test. Modification factors considering multiaxial fracture and strain rate effect were proposed in order to simulate notch bar creep tensile test using FE analysis. Using proposed models, FE result of strain based and energy based damage model are compared with notch bar creep tensile test. As a result, both strain and energy based damage model simulates crack growth well during creep, However, when tertiary creep behavior is considered, energy based failure model simulate rupture time longer than strain based model. It can be inferred that plastic damage accumulation of energy based model is slower than that of strain based model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信