跨国公司的适宜性机制——一个跨国比较

P. Faria, W. Sofka
{"title":"跨国公司的适宜性机制——一个跨国比较","authors":"P. Faria, W. Sofka","doi":"10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International knowledge spillovers, especially through multinational companies (MNC), have been a major theme of recent academic and practitioner discussion. However, relatively little is known about their capabilities for protecting valuable knowledge from spilling over to host country competitors. We extend this stream of research by investigating MNC appropriability strategies that are not limited to formal methods (patents, copyrights, trademarks) but include also strategic ones (secrecy, lead time, complex design). Hence, we conceptualize a firmpsilas breadth and depth of knowledge protection strategies and relate them to the particular situation of MNC subsidiaries. Moreover, we argue that their approaches differ with regards to host country challenges and opportunities. We test these hypotheses empirically based on a harmonized survey of more than 1,800 firms and their innovation activities in both Portugal and Germany. We find that MNCs prefer broader sets of appropriability strategies in host countries with fewer opportunities for knowledge sourcing. However, munificent environments require targeted sets of appropriability strategies instead. We suspect that this is due to a need for reciprocity in promising host country knowledge flows.","PeriodicalId":408691,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriability mechanisms of multinational firms — A cross country comparison\",\"authors\":\"P. Faria, W. Sofka\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International knowledge spillovers, especially through multinational companies (MNC), have been a major theme of recent academic and practitioner discussion. However, relatively little is known about their capabilities for protecting valuable knowledge from spilling over to host country competitors. We extend this stream of research by investigating MNC appropriability strategies that are not limited to formal methods (patents, copyrights, trademarks) but include also strategic ones (secrecy, lead time, complex design). Hence, we conceptualize a firmpsilas breadth and depth of knowledge protection strategies and relate them to the particular situation of MNC subsidiaries. Moreover, we argue that their approaches differ with regards to host country challenges and opportunities. We test these hypotheses empirically based on a harmonized survey of more than 1,800 firms and their innovation activities in both Portugal and Germany. We find that MNCs prefer broader sets of appropriability strategies in host countries with fewer opportunities for knowledge sourcing. However, munificent environments require targeted sets of appropriability strategies instead. We suspect that this is due to a need for reciprocity in promising host country knowledge flows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

国际知识溢出,特别是通过跨国公司(MNC)的知识溢出,已经成为最近学术界和实践者讨论的一个主要主题。然而,对于它们保护宝贵知识不泄露给东道国竞争对手的能力,人们所知相对较少。我们通过调查跨国公司的适宜性策略来扩展这一研究流,这些策略不仅限于形式方法(专利、版权、商标),还包括战略方法(保密、交货时间、复杂设计)。因此,我们将企业知识保护策略的广度和深度概念化,并将其与跨国公司子公司的具体情况联系起来。此外,我们认为他们的方法因东道国的挑战和机遇而有所不同。我们根据对葡萄牙和德国1800多家公司及其创新活动的统一调查,对这些假设进行了实证检验。我们发现,跨国公司倾向于在东道国采用更广泛的适宜性策略,而东道国的知识来源机会较少。然而,华丽的环境需要一组针对性的适宜性策略。我们怀疑这是由于有希望的东道国知识流动需要互惠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appropriability mechanisms of multinational firms — A cross country comparison
International knowledge spillovers, especially through multinational companies (MNC), have been a major theme of recent academic and practitioner discussion. However, relatively little is known about their capabilities for protecting valuable knowledge from spilling over to host country competitors. We extend this stream of research by investigating MNC appropriability strategies that are not limited to formal methods (patents, copyrights, trademarks) but include also strategic ones (secrecy, lead time, complex design). Hence, we conceptualize a firmpsilas breadth and depth of knowledge protection strategies and relate them to the particular situation of MNC subsidiaries. Moreover, we argue that their approaches differ with regards to host country challenges and opportunities. We test these hypotheses empirically based on a harmonized survey of more than 1,800 firms and their innovation activities in both Portugal and Germany. We find that MNCs prefer broader sets of appropriability strategies in host countries with fewer opportunities for knowledge sourcing. However, munificent environments require targeted sets of appropriability strategies instead. We suspect that this is due to a need for reciprocity in promising host country knowledge flows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信