向恐怖主义受害者赔偿

R. Hendriana
{"title":"向恐怖主义受害者赔偿","authors":"R. Hendriana","doi":"10.2991/icglow-19.2019.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- In practice indemnity for victims of criminal acts of terrorism tend to be given in the form of compensation. As a result, the perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism often doesn’t have responsibility to compensate the victims. Based on this, it is necessary to study the use of restitution for victims of criminal acts of terrorism. The methodology used is qualitative with a social legal research approach. The results show that in its implementation victims of terrorism often do not apply for restitution. There are several factors that make restitution difficult to implement. Therefore, it have to be based on victim’s interest, whether the victim will apply for both restitution and compensation, or directly submit compensation. Even if the victim proposes restitution, compensation should still be a state obligation that must be given to the victim.","PeriodicalId":246077,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restitution for Victims of Terrorism\",\"authors\":\"R. Hendriana\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/icglow-19.2019.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"- In practice indemnity for victims of criminal acts of terrorism tend to be given in the form of compensation. As a result, the perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism often doesn’t have responsibility to compensate the victims. Based on this, it is necessary to study the use of restitution for victims of criminal acts of terrorism. The methodology used is qualitative with a social legal research approach. The results show that in its implementation victims of terrorism often do not apply for restitution. There are several factors that make restitution difficult to implement. Therefore, it have to be based on victim’s interest, whether the victim will apply for both restitution and compensation, or directly submit compensation. Even if the victim proposes restitution, compensation should still be a state obligation that must be given to the victim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-在实践中,对恐怖主义犯罪行为受害者的赔偿往往以赔偿的形式提供。因此,恐怖主义犯罪行为的肇事者往往没有责任赔偿受害者。在此基础上,有必要对恐怖主义犯罪行为受害人的赔偿适用问题进行研究。使用的方法是定性的社会法律研究方法。结果表明,在实施过程中,恐怖主义受害者往往不申请赔偿。有几个因素使赔偿难以执行。因此,必须从受害人的利益出发,受害人是申请赔偿和赔偿并重,还是直接提出赔偿。即使受害者提出赔偿,赔偿仍应是一项国家义务,必须给予受害者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restitution for Victims of Terrorism
- In practice indemnity for victims of criminal acts of terrorism tend to be given in the form of compensation. As a result, the perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism often doesn’t have responsibility to compensate the victims. Based on this, it is necessary to study the use of restitution for victims of criminal acts of terrorism. The methodology used is qualitative with a social legal research approach. The results show that in its implementation victims of terrorism often do not apply for restitution. There are several factors that make restitution difficult to implement. Therefore, it have to be based on victim’s interest, whether the victim will apply for both restitution and compensation, or directly submit compensation. Even if the victim proposes restitution, compensation should still be a state obligation that must be given to the victim.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信