无人机低空磁测与地面磁测灵敏度对比分析

N. Snegirev, S. Gachenko, A. Parshin
{"title":"无人机低空磁测与地面磁测灵敏度对比分析","authors":"N. Snegirev, S. Gachenko, A. Parshin","doi":"10.21285/2686-9993-2023-46-2-182-189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the study is the problem of the decline degree of the information content of geophysical data when switching from land surveys to low-altitude geophysical survey using unmanned aerial vehicles. The research involves a comparative analysis of the information content of the unmanned aerial vehicle survey results and those of the land magnetic survey. The conducted research allowed to present the observed values of the magnetic field obtained  by both survey methods within the same area as well as the final information products in the form of the results of filtering and three-dimensional data inversion. It is shown that visual analysis of maps of the full vector of magnetic field strength gives the impression of a lower information content of magnetic survey performed by unmanned aerial vehicles. However, the data having been processed create final information products of identical information content. This concerns both the results of three-dimensional modeling of the effective magnetic susceptibility, and maps and plots of the anomalous magnetic field after filtering in a sliding window. The negative impact of geological interference from morainic deposits on ground data is also shown. Local magnetic anomalies based on unmanned aerial vehicle survey results can confidently correlate with land survey anomalies, whereas the data collected during low-altitude aeromagnetic survey using unmanned aerial vehicles have a lower error probability. The conclusions refer to a specific case and cannot be unambiguously applied  to any geological situation, however, the authors believe in the typicality of this example.","PeriodicalId":128080,"journal":{"name":"Earth sciences and subsoil use","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of low-altitude magnetic survey sensitivity using unmanned aerial vehicles and land magnetic survey\",\"authors\":\"N. Snegirev, S. Gachenko, A. Parshin\",\"doi\":\"10.21285/2686-9993-2023-46-2-182-189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of the study is the problem of the decline degree of the information content of geophysical data when switching from land surveys to low-altitude geophysical survey using unmanned aerial vehicles. The research involves a comparative analysis of the information content of the unmanned aerial vehicle survey results and those of the land magnetic survey. The conducted research allowed to present the observed values of the magnetic field obtained  by both survey methods within the same area as well as the final information products in the form of the results of filtering and three-dimensional data inversion. It is shown that visual analysis of maps of the full vector of magnetic field strength gives the impression of a lower information content of magnetic survey performed by unmanned aerial vehicles. However, the data having been processed create final information products of identical information content. This concerns both the results of three-dimensional modeling of the effective magnetic susceptibility, and maps and plots of the anomalous magnetic field after filtering in a sliding window. The negative impact of geological interference from morainic deposits on ground data is also shown. Local magnetic anomalies based on unmanned aerial vehicle survey results can confidently correlate with land survey anomalies, whereas the data collected during low-altitude aeromagnetic survey using unmanned aerial vehicles have a lower error probability. The conclusions refer to a specific case and cannot be unambiguously applied  to any geological situation, however, the authors believe in the typicality of this example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth sciences and subsoil use\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth sciences and subsoil use\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2023-46-2-182-189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth sciences and subsoil use","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2023-46-2-182-189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究的主题是无人机低空物探调查从陆地调查转向低空物探时,物探数据信息量下降程度的问题。对无人机测量结果与地磁测量结果的信息含量进行了对比分析。通过研究,可以将两种测量方法在同一区域内获得的磁场观测值以及最终的信息产品以滤波和三维数据反演结果的形式呈现出来。结果表明,对磁场强度全矢量图进行可视化分析,会给人一种无人机磁测信息含量较低的印象。然而,经过处理的数据产生了具有相同信息内容的最终信息产品。这既涉及有效磁化率的三维建模结果,也涉及滑动窗口滤波后的异常磁场图和图。此外,还显示了冰碛物的地质干扰对地面数据的负面影响。基于无人机测量结果的局部磁异常与陆地测量异常具有较强的相关性,而无人机低空航磁测量数据的误差概率较低。结论是指一个具体的情况,不能明确地适用于任何地质情况,但是,作者认为这个例子具有典型性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of low-altitude magnetic survey sensitivity using unmanned aerial vehicles and land magnetic survey
The subject of the study is the problem of the decline degree of the information content of geophysical data when switching from land surveys to low-altitude geophysical survey using unmanned aerial vehicles. The research involves a comparative analysis of the information content of the unmanned aerial vehicle survey results and those of the land magnetic survey. The conducted research allowed to present the observed values of the magnetic field obtained  by both survey methods within the same area as well as the final information products in the form of the results of filtering and three-dimensional data inversion. It is shown that visual analysis of maps of the full vector of magnetic field strength gives the impression of a lower information content of magnetic survey performed by unmanned aerial vehicles. However, the data having been processed create final information products of identical information content. This concerns both the results of three-dimensional modeling of the effective magnetic susceptibility, and maps and plots of the anomalous magnetic field after filtering in a sliding window. The negative impact of geological interference from morainic deposits on ground data is also shown. Local magnetic anomalies based on unmanned aerial vehicle survey results can confidently correlate with land survey anomalies, whereas the data collected during low-altitude aeromagnetic survey using unmanned aerial vehicles have a lower error probability. The conclusions refer to a specific case and cannot be unambiguously applied  to any geological situation, however, the authors believe in the typicality of this example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信