20世纪美国文明使命的文化转型

F. Ninkovich
{"title":"20世纪美国文明使命的文化转型","authors":"F. Ninkovich","doi":"10.1163/9789004438125_003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long before the United States of America became an independent nation, the civilizing mission was a conspicuous feature of how Americans sought to deal with indigenous peoples thought to be savage or barbaric. In the aftermath of the SpanishAmerican War of 1898, the longstanding focus on reshaping native Americans shifted overseas when political leaders promised to modernize the nation’s newly acquired colonial possessions. That commitment lasted only a halfcentury before policymakers renounced colonial governance for the US, chided other colonizers for perpetuating their rule, and switched to an updated version of the civilizing mission by urging newly independent nations to embrace marketfriendly development policies. This trajectory coincided with the global upheaval of decolonization in which the family of nations more than quintupled between 1920 and 2000 to its current membership of about 195 sovereign states. So in less than half a century, the US flirtation with traditional territorial empire or colonialism passed away (for the most part), while its dirigiste civilizing mission was succeeded by unimposed modernization whose object was to persuade the socalled third world countries to embrace liberal developmental precepts.1 How does one account for this transformation in US policy? A comprehensive answer would need to take into account a long but obvious list of causal factors: the rise of cultural anthropology and cultural relativism, accompanied by the demolition of scientific racism by modern science; the development of modernization theory in sociology and political science; the explosion of political consciousness and formidable liberation movements in India, China, Indonesia, Indochina, Algeria and elsewhere; the disappointing failure of","PeriodicalId":140473,"journal":{"name":"Civilizing Missions in the Twentieth Century","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cultural Transformation of America’s Civilizing Mission in the Twentieth Century\",\"authors\":\"F. Ninkovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004438125_003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Long before the United States of America became an independent nation, the civilizing mission was a conspicuous feature of how Americans sought to deal with indigenous peoples thought to be savage or barbaric. In the aftermath of the SpanishAmerican War of 1898, the longstanding focus on reshaping native Americans shifted overseas when political leaders promised to modernize the nation’s newly acquired colonial possessions. That commitment lasted only a halfcentury before policymakers renounced colonial governance for the US, chided other colonizers for perpetuating their rule, and switched to an updated version of the civilizing mission by urging newly independent nations to embrace marketfriendly development policies. This trajectory coincided with the global upheaval of decolonization in which the family of nations more than quintupled between 1920 and 2000 to its current membership of about 195 sovereign states. So in less than half a century, the US flirtation with traditional territorial empire or colonialism passed away (for the most part), while its dirigiste civilizing mission was succeeded by unimposed modernization whose object was to persuade the socalled third world countries to embrace liberal developmental precepts.1 How does one account for this transformation in US policy? A comprehensive answer would need to take into account a long but obvious list of causal factors: the rise of cultural anthropology and cultural relativism, accompanied by the demolition of scientific racism by modern science; the development of modernization theory in sociology and political science; the explosion of political consciousness and formidable liberation movements in India, China, Indonesia, Indochina, Algeria and elsewhere; the disappointing failure of\",\"PeriodicalId\":140473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civilizing Missions in the Twentieth Century\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civilizing Missions in the Twentieth Century\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004438125_003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civilizing Missions in the Twentieth Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004438125_003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早在美利坚合众国成为一个独立的国家之前,教化使命就是美国人如何对待被认为是野蛮人或野蛮人的土著民族的一个显著特征。1898年美西战争结束后,政治领导人承诺要使美国新获得的殖民地现代化,长期以来对重塑美国原住民的关注转移到了海外。这一承诺只持续了半个世纪,后来政策制定者就放弃了美国的殖民统治,指责其他殖民者延续了他们的统治,并转向一种更新版本的教化使命,敦促新独立的国家接受有利于市场的发展政策。这一轨迹与非殖民化的全球剧变相吻合。在非殖民化进程中,国际大家庭在1920年至2000年间增加了五倍多,目前拥有约195个主权国家。因此,在不到半个世纪的时间里,美国对传统领土帝国或殖民主义的调情(在很大程度上)消失了,而其计划主义的文明使命被非强加的现代化所取代,其目的是说服所谓的第三世界国家接受自由主义的发展原则如何解释美国政策的这种转变?一个全面的答案需要考虑到一长串明显的因果因素:文化人类学和文化相对主义的兴起,伴随着现代科学对科学种族主义的摧毁;社会学与政治学现代化理论的发展令人失望的失败
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cultural Transformation of America’s Civilizing Mission in the Twentieth Century
Long before the United States of America became an independent nation, the civilizing mission was a conspicuous feature of how Americans sought to deal with indigenous peoples thought to be savage or barbaric. In the aftermath of the SpanishAmerican War of 1898, the longstanding focus on reshaping native Americans shifted overseas when political leaders promised to modernize the nation’s newly acquired colonial possessions. That commitment lasted only a halfcentury before policymakers renounced colonial governance for the US, chided other colonizers for perpetuating their rule, and switched to an updated version of the civilizing mission by urging newly independent nations to embrace marketfriendly development policies. This trajectory coincided with the global upheaval of decolonization in which the family of nations more than quintupled between 1920 and 2000 to its current membership of about 195 sovereign states. So in less than half a century, the US flirtation with traditional territorial empire or colonialism passed away (for the most part), while its dirigiste civilizing mission was succeeded by unimposed modernization whose object was to persuade the socalled third world countries to embrace liberal developmental precepts.1 How does one account for this transformation in US policy? A comprehensive answer would need to take into account a long but obvious list of causal factors: the rise of cultural anthropology and cultural relativism, accompanied by the demolition of scientific racism by modern science; the development of modernization theory in sociology and political science; the explosion of political consciousness and formidable liberation movements in India, China, Indonesia, Indochina, Algeria and elsewhere; the disappointing failure of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信