两种药物对种植牙患者镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验

Alexander Saber, A. Kassir, N. Naaman, N. Mokbel, Layal Bou Semaan, M. Dagher
{"title":"两种药物对种植牙患者镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Alexander Saber, A. Kassir, N. Naaman, N. Mokbel, Layal Bou Semaan, M. Dagher","doi":"10.3844/crdsp.2021.71.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Layal A. Bou Semaan Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon Email: layal.bs@live.com Abstract: The aim of this randomized control trial was to compare the analgesic efficacy of two commonly prescribed medications, mefenamic acid (PonstanTM Forte) and lysine clonixinate (Dorixina®) in patients undergoing dental implant surgery. A total of 130 patients receiving dental implants were randomized into two groups: 75 Treated with Mefenamic Acid (MA) and 75 with Lysine Clonixinate (LC). The primary outcome was the change in pain scores according to a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) recorded by the patients on a questionnaire over 7 days post-operatively. Secondary outcome was analgesic consumption taken as a rescue medication. 102 patients (78.5%) completed questionnaires and were available for analysis. No significant difference was found for both outcome measures during the first 4 days post-operative. However, the mean VAS score was significantly lower in LC group at days 5, 6 and 7 compared to MA group. The results of this study suggests that there is no difference in the analgesic efficacy between MA and LC when prescribed as pain medications following dental implant surgery. The abovementioned findings will help clinicians to have a better understanding of the analgesic efficacy of two different medications in implant surgery. When anti-inflammatory drugs are contraindicated in patients undergoing implant treatment, LC can be safely prescribed with the same analgesic efficacy of an AINS.","PeriodicalId":117844,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Dentistry","volume":"341 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Two Medications in Patients Receiving Dental Implants a Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Saber, A. Kassir, N. Naaman, N. Mokbel, Layal Bou Semaan, M. Dagher\",\"doi\":\"10.3844/crdsp.2021.71.76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Layal A. Bou Semaan Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon Email: layal.bs@live.com Abstract: The aim of this randomized control trial was to compare the analgesic efficacy of two commonly prescribed medications, mefenamic acid (PonstanTM Forte) and lysine clonixinate (Dorixina®) in patients undergoing dental implant surgery. A total of 130 patients receiving dental implants were randomized into two groups: 75 Treated with Mefenamic Acid (MA) and 75 with Lysine Clonixinate (LC). The primary outcome was the change in pain scores according to a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) recorded by the patients on a questionnaire over 7 days post-operatively. Secondary outcome was analgesic consumption taken as a rescue medication. 102 patients (78.5%) completed questionnaires and were available for analysis. No significant difference was found for both outcome measures during the first 4 days post-operative. However, the mean VAS score was significantly lower in LC group at days 5, 6 and 7 compared to MA group. The results of this study suggests that there is no difference in the analgesic efficacy between MA and LC when prescribed as pain medications following dental implant surgery. The abovementioned findings will help clinicians to have a better understanding of the analgesic efficacy of two different medications in implant surgery. When anti-inflammatory drugs are contraindicated in patients undergoing implant treatment, LC can be safely prescribed with the same analgesic efficacy of an AINS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"341 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3844/crdsp.2021.71.76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/crdsp.2021.71.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本随机对照试验的目的是比较两种常用处方药物甲氧胺酸(PonstanTM Forte)和赖氨酸氯辛酸(Dorixina®)在种植牙手术患者中的镇痛效果。将130例种植牙患者随机分为两组:75例甲氧胺酸(MA)治疗组和75例氯硝辛酸赖氨酸(LC)治疗组。主要观察结果是术后7天内患者根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录的疼痛评分的变化。次要结果是镇痛药作为抢救用药。102例(78.5%)患者完成问卷调查,可供分析。术后头4天两项指标均无显著差异。然而,LC组在第5、6、7天的VAS平均评分明显低于MA组。本研究结果表明,MA和LC作为种植牙术后止痛药的镇痛效果没有差异。上述发现将有助于临床医生更好地了解两种不同药物在种植体手术中的镇痛效果。当接受种植治疗的患者有抗炎药物禁忌时,LC可以安全地使用,其镇痛效果与AINS相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Two Medications in Patients Receiving Dental Implants a Randomized Controlled Trial
Layal A. Bou Semaan Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon Email: layal.bs@live.com Abstract: The aim of this randomized control trial was to compare the analgesic efficacy of two commonly prescribed medications, mefenamic acid (PonstanTM Forte) and lysine clonixinate (Dorixina®) in patients undergoing dental implant surgery. A total of 130 patients receiving dental implants were randomized into two groups: 75 Treated with Mefenamic Acid (MA) and 75 with Lysine Clonixinate (LC). The primary outcome was the change in pain scores according to a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) recorded by the patients on a questionnaire over 7 days post-operatively. Secondary outcome was analgesic consumption taken as a rescue medication. 102 patients (78.5%) completed questionnaires and were available for analysis. No significant difference was found for both outcome measures during the first 4 days post-operative. However, the mean VAS score was significantly lower in LC group at days 5, 6 and 7 compared to MA group. The results of this study suggests that there is no difference in the analgesic efficacy between MA and LC when prescribed as pain medications following dental implant surgery. The abovementioned findings will help clinicians to have a better understanding of the analgesic efficacy of two different medications in implant surgery. When anti-inflammatory drugs are contraindicated in patients undergoing implant treatment, LC can be safely prescribed with the same analgesic efficacy of an AINS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信