外国直接投资(FDI)

R. Wellhausen
{"title":"外国直接投资(FDI)","authors":"R. Wellhausen","doi":"10.1787/9a523b18-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consensus on the concept of foreign direct investment (FDI) has sparked an enormous body of research that confirms the importance of separating FDI and its politics from other forms of international economy activity. At the same time, international political economy research on FDI is in danger of becoming a victim of its own success: by too readily accepting the parameters of “F,” “D,” and “I,” we risk undervaluing high-priority research agendas that push conceptual boundaries. As evidence, this chapter highlights gains made by probing the “F” in FDI—by disaggregating national origins; separating foreign state or private owners; and considering “F” in the context of its domestic counterparts. Recognizing the huge progress made due to de facto agreement on what constitutes FDI, scholars in all IPE research traditions would do well to prioritize research questions that critically engage with the concept.","PeriodicalId":360159,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)\",\"authors\":\"R. Wellhausen\",\"doi\":\"10.1787/9a523b18-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consensus on the concept of foreign direct investment (FDI) has sparked an enormous body of research that confirms the importance of separating FDI and its politics from other forms of international economy activity. At the same time, international political economy research on FDI is in danger of becoming a victim of its own success: by too readily accepting the parameters of “F,” “D,” and “I,” we risk undervaluing high-priority research agendas that push conceptual boundaries. As evidence, this chapter highlights gains made by probing the “F” in FDI—by disaggregating national origins; separating foreign state or private owners; and considering “F” in the context of its domestic counterparts. Recognizing the huge progress made due to de facto agreement on what constitutes FDI, scholars in all IPE research traditions would do well to prioritize research questions that critically engage with the concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1787/9a523b18-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/9a523b18-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于外国直接投资概念的共识引发了大量的研究,这些研究证实了将外国直接投资及其政治与其他形式的国际经济活动分开的重要性。与此同时,关于外国直接投资的国际政治经济学研究有可能成为其自身成功的受害者:由于太容易接受“F”、“D”和“I”的参数,我们有可能低估推动概念界限的高优先级研究议程。作为证据,本章强调了通过探讨外国直接投资的“F”所取得的成果——通过分解国家来源;分离外国国有或私人所有者;并在国内同行的背景下考虑“F”。认识到由于对什么是外国直接投资达成了事实上的共识而取得的巨大进步,所有国际政治经济学研究传统的学者都应该优先考虑与这一概念批判性地联系在一起的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
Consensus on the concept of foreign direct investment (FDI) has sparked an enormous body of research that confirms the importance of separating FDI and its politics from other forms of international economy activity. At the same time, international political economy research on FDI is in danger of becoming a victim of its own success: by too readily accepting the parameters of “F,” “D,” and “I,” we risk undervaluing high-priority research agendas that push conceptual boundaries. As evidence, this chapter highlights gains made by probing the “F” in FDI—by disaggregating national origins; separating foreign state or private owners; and considering “F” in the context of its domestic counterparts. Recognizing the huge progress made due to de facto agreement on what constitutes FDI, scholars in all IPE research traditions would do well to prioritize research questions that critically engage with the concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信