森林与洪水缓解:来自中国的证据

Kaori Tembata, Ken’ichi Matsumoto, Masashi Yamamoto, Yuki Yamamoto
{"title":"森林与洪水缓解:来自中国的证据","authors":"Kaori Tembata, Ken’ichi Matsumoto, Masashi Yamamoto, Yuki Yamamoto","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3515698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Combining a popular flood disaster dataset with climate data and satellite land cover data from China, this paper estimates how forests mitigate the frequency of flooding, resulting in two major findings. First, we confirm that an increase in forest area mitigates the possibility of flood occurrence even after controlling for socioeconomic and meteorological variables and time-invariant individual effects. Second, broadleaf trees and mixed-tree forests have a flood mitigation effect, whereas coniferous trees do not; these results are robust against several robustness checks. This paper newly corroborates the concept of ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. While there is an emerging consensus that ecosystems can mitigate natural disasters, there is limited evidence on how ecosystems mitigate disasters. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to show that the type of forest is critical for mitigating floods in a rigorous econometric way spanning numerous areas of interest.","PeriodicalId":200332,"journal":{"name":"GeologyRN: Geologic Hazards (Topic)","volume":"318 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest and Floods Mitigation: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Kaori Tembata, Ken’ichi Matsumoto, Masashi Yamamoto, Yuki Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3515698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Combining a popular flood disaster dataset with climate data and satellite land cover data from China, this paper estimates how forests mitigate the frequency of flooding, resulting in two major findings. First, we confirm that an increase in forest area mitigates the possibility of flood occurrence even after controlling for socioeconomic and meteorological variables and time-invariant individual effects. Second, broadleaf trees and mixed-tree forests have a flood mitigation effect, whereas coniferous trees do not; these results are robust against several robustness checks. This paper newly corroborates the concept of ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. While there is an emerging consensus that ecosystems can mitigate natural disasters, there is limited evidence on how ecosystems mitigate disasters. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to show that the type of forest is critical for mitigating floods in a rigorous econometric way spanning numerous areas of interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeologyRN: Geologic Hazards (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"318 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeologyRN: Geologic Hazards (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3515698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeologyRN: Geologic Hazards (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3515698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文将一个流行的洪水灾害数据集与中国的气候数据和卫星土地覆盖数据结合起来,估计了森林如何减轻洪水的频率,得出了两个主要发现。首先,我们证实,即使在控制了社会经济和气象变量以及时不变个体效应之后,森林面积的增加也会减轻洪水发生的可能性。第二,阔叶树和混交林具有缓解洪水的作用,而针叶树则没有;这些结果对于几个稳健性检查是稳健性的。本文重新验证了基于生态系统的减灾概念。虽然生态系统可以减轻自然灾害这一共识正在形成,但关于生态系统如何减轻灾害的证据有限。据作者所知,这项研究首次以严格的计量经济学方法,跨越了许多感兴趣的领域,表明森林类型对减轻洪水至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forest and Floods Mitigation: Evidence from China
Combining a popular flood disaster dataset with climate data and satellite land cover data from China, this paper estimates how forests mitigate the frequency of flooding, resulting in two major findings. First, we confirm that an increase in forest area mitigates the possibility of flood occurrence even after controlling for socioeconomic and meteorological variables and time-invariant individual effects. Second, broadleaf trees and mixed-tree forests have a flood mitigation effect, whereas coniferous trees do not; these results are robust against several robustness checks. This paper newly corroborates the concept of ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. While there is an emerging consensus that ecosystems can mitigate natural disasters, there is limited evidence on how ecosystems mitigate disasters. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to show that the type of forest is critical for mitigating floods in a rigorous econometric way spanning numerous areas of interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信