信息可视化中使用模式分析的方法

M. Pohl
{"title":"信息可视化中使用模式分析的方法","authors":"M. Pohl","doi":"10.1145/2442576.2442593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this position paper, we describe two methods for the analysis of sequences of interaction with information visualization tools -- log file analysis and thinking aloud. Such an analysis is valuable because it can help designers to understand cognition processes of the users and, as a consequence, to improve the design of information visualizations. In this context, we also discuss the issue of categorization of user activities. Categorization helps researchers to generalize results and compare different information visualization tools.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodologies for the analysis of usage patterns in information visualization\",\"authors\":\"M. Pohl\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2442576.2442593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this position paper, we describe two methods for the analysis of sequences of interaction with information visualization tools -- log file analysis and thinking aloud. Such an analysis is valuable because it can help designers to understand cognition processes of the users and, as a consequence, to improve the design of information visualizations. In this context, we also discuss the issue of categorization of user activities. Categorization helps researchers to generalize results and compare different information visualization tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2442576.2442593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2442576.2442593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在这篇论文中,我们描述了两种分析与信息可视化工具交互序列的方法——日志文件分析和大声思考。这样的分析是有价值的,因为它可以帮助设计师了解用户的认知过程,从而改进信息可视化的设计。在此背景下,我们还讨论了用户活动的分类问题。分类帮助研究人员概括结果并比较不同的信息可视化工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodologies for the analysis of usage patterns in information visualization
In this position paper, we describe two methods for the analysis of sequences of interaction with information visualization tools -- log file analysis and thinking aloud. Such an analysis is valuable because it can help designers to understand cognition processes of the users and, as a consequence, to improve the design of information visualizations. In this context, we also discuss the issue of categorization of user activities. Categorization helps researchers to generalize results and compare different information visualization tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信