结构正常人脑室激活恢复间隔的光学映射验证

Peter Langfield, J. Duchâteau, R. Walton, F. Sacher, J. Rogier, L. Labrousse, F. Brette, M. Hocini, M. Haïssaguerre, O. Bernus, E. Vigmond
{"title":"结构正常人脑室激活恢复间隔的光学映射验证","authors":"Peter Langfield, J. Duchâteau, R. Walton, F. Sacher, J. Rogier, L. Labrousse, F. Brette, M. Hocini, M. Haïssaguerre, O. Bernus, E. Vigmond","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2018.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A large Dispersion of Repolarization (DoR) is associated with an increased arrhythmogenic risk. This can be measured clinically by calculating the Activation Recovery Interval (ARI) to estimate Action Potential Duration (APD). However, the ability of ARI to accurately predict APD dispersion in patients with repolarization abnormality has not been determined. Objective: Compare ARI calculated from patients with optical mapping of human hearts to establish the validity of ARI as a surrogate for APD. Methods: Optical mapping (OM) was performed on the left ventricles of 4 explanted human hearts. APD and repolarization times were measured endo- and epicardially on the anterior of the LV. Electroanatomic mapping was performed with CARTO over the entire endo- and epicardial surfaces of 3 patients. Activation and repolarization were calculated, dispersion of ARI was measured. Results: APD and ARI were consistent between mapping methods over most of the sub-regions studied. Epicardium ARI dispersion was consistently higher than that of the endocardium in both OM and CARTO datasets. Conclusion: APD distribution, and consequently DoR, agree between mapping methods. Measuring DoR by ARI accurately assesses the underlying repolarization abnormalities in patients.","PeriodicalId":215521,"journal":{"name":"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Activation Recovery Interval in Structurally Normal Human Ventricles by Optical Mapping\",\"authors\":\"Peter Langfield, J. Duchâteau, R. Walton, F. Sacher, J. Rogier, L. Labrousse, F. Brette, M. Hocini, M. Haïssaguerre, O. Bernus, E. Vigmond\",\"doi\":\"10.22489/CinC.2018.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A large Dispersion of Repolarization (DoR) is associated with an increased arrhythmogenic risk. This can be measured clinically by calculating the Activation Recovery Interval (ARI) to estimate Action Potential Duration (APD). However, the ability of ARI to accurately predict APD dispersion in patients with repolarization abnormality has not been determined. Objective: Compare ARI calculated from patients with optical mapping of human hearts to establish the validity of ARI as a surrogate for APD. Methods: Optical mapping (OM) was performed on the left ventricles of 4 explanted human hearts. APD and repolarization times were measured endo- and epicardially on the anterior of the LV. Electroanatomic mapping was performed with CARTO over the entire endo- and epicardial surfaces of 3 patients. Activation and repolarization were calculated, dispersion of ARI was measured. Results: APD and ARI were consistent between mapping methods over most of the sub-regions studied. Epicardium ARI dispersion was consistently higher than that of the endocardium in both OM and CARTO datasets. Conclusion: APD distribution, and consequently DoR, agree between mapping methods. Measuring DoR by ARI accurately assesses the underlying repolarization abnormalities in patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2018.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2018.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:复极弥散度大(DoR)与心律失常风险增加有关。这可以在临床上通过计算激活恢复间隔(ARI)来估计动作电位持续时间(APD)来测量。然而,ARI准确预测复极异常患者APD弥散度的能力尚未确定。目的:比较患者心脏光学测图计算的ARI,建立ARI作为APD替代指标的有效性。方法:对4例离体心脏左心室进行光学成像。在左室前壁和心外膜处测量APD和复极时间。用CARTO对3例患者的整个心内和心外膜表面进行电解剖定位。计算了ARI的活化和复极化,测量了ARI的色散。结果:APD和ARI在大多数研究分区的制图方法之间是一致的。在OM和CARTO数据集中,心外膜ARI弥散度始终高于心内膜。结论:APD分布及相应的DoR在不同的制图方法上是一致的。通过ARI测量DoR可准确评估患者潜在的复极异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Activation Recovery Interval in Structurally Normal Human Ventricles by Optical Mapping
Background: A large Dispersion of Repolarization (DoR) is associated with an increased arrhythmogenic risk. This can be measured clinically by calculating the Activation Recovery Interval (ARI) to estimate Action Potential Duration (APD). However, the ability of ARI to accurately predict APD dispersion in patients with repolarization abnormality has not been determined. Objective: Compare ARI calculated from patients with optical mapping of human hearts to establish the validity of ARI as a surrogate for APD. Methods: Optical mapping (OM) was performed on the left ventricles of 4 explanted human hearts. APD and repolarization times were measured endo- and epicardially on the anterior of the LV. Electroanatomic mapping was performed with CARTO over the entire endo- and epicardial surfaces of 3 patients. Activation and repolarization were calculated, dispersion of ARI was measured. Results: APD and ARI were consistent between mapping methods over most of the sub-regions studied. Epicardium ARI dispersion was consistently higher than that of the endocardium in both OM and CARTO datasets. Conclusion: APD distribution, and consequently DoR, agree between mapping methods. Measuring DoR by ARI accurately assesses the underlying repolarization abnormalities in patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信