WTO国内支持规则下的农业政策空间

Food Laws Pub Date : 2015-07-28 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2659406
L. Brink
{"title":"WTO国内支持规则下的农业政策空间","authors":"L. Brink","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2659406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A concept of policy space is formulated under the domestic support rules of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. This policy space is dyadic, comprising two kinds of space: exemption space and limited space. The two kinds are available differently for different countries. Exemption space derives from the entitlement to exempt policies that meet given criteria from those policies under which support counts against the country’s limit(s), i.e., exemption space allows limitless support. The criteria are those of Annex 2, Article 6.2 and Article 6.5 of the Agreement (green, development and blue boxes). Limited space derives from the entitlement to provide support under non-exempt policies up to the country’s limit(s). For most countries the limits are the de minimis levels calculated from the value of production of each product and of agriculture as whole, using the country’s de minimis percentage. For 32 countries (15 developed and 17 developing) the limit is the Bound Total Aggregate Measurement of Support (BTAMS) and the de minimis levels are thresholds above which support counts against the limit. Some acquisition of foodstuffs at administered prices is subject to special rules, now subject to negotiations with implications for both exemption space and limited space and the interaction between these two kinds of space. The Agreement’s criteria are reviewed to interpret the factors determining a country’s exemption space. In determining limited space, the centrality of a country’s values of production is illustrated by tracking limited space from 1995 to 2012 for the EU, the US, India and China under assumptions of perfect management of maximum support. China’s rapidly rising values of production have generated limited space that now greatly exceeds that of the EU. The US limited space has been rising but India’s limited space is growing faster and approaches the US level. In recent years these four countries have used only a small part of their limited space. As values of production rise in individual countries and in the world, the relative importance of BTAMS as a component of limited space declines since it stays fixed in nominal terms. The amount and the share of non-exempt support that can be accommodated within the de minimis provisions are thus increasing for individual countries and in total for the world. Some countries with declining values of production in agriculture are the exceptions, e.g., Japan. The different entitlement of different countries to limitless exemption space, in combination with limited space growing faster in some countries than in others, means that the picture of countries’ policy space for domestic support to agricultural producers is rapidly changing from the picture when the Doha negotiations started.","PeriodicalId":365834,"journal":{"name":"Food Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy Space in Agriculture Under the WTO Rules on Domestic Support\",\"authors\":\"L. Brink\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2659406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A concept of policy space is formulated under the domestic support rules of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. This policy space is dyadic, comprising two kinds of space: exemption space and limited space. The two kinds are available differently for different countries. Exemption space derives from the entitlement to exempt policies that meet given criteria from those policies under which support counts against the country’s limit(s), i.e., exemption space allows limitless support. The criteria are those of Annex 2, Article 6.2 and Article 6.5 of the Agreement (green, development and blue boxes). Limited space derives from the entitlement to provide support under non-exempt policies up to the country’s limit(s). For most countries the limits are the de minimis levels calculated from the value of production of each product and of agriculture as whole, using the country’s de minimis percentage. For 32 countries (15 developed and 17 developing) the limit is the Bound Total Aggregate Measurement of Support (BTAMS) and the de minimis levels are thresholds above which support counts against the limit. Some acquisition of foodstuffs at administered prices is subject to special rules, now subject to negotiations with implications for both exemption space and limited space and the interaction between these two kinds of space. The Agreement’s criteria are reviewed to interpret the factors determining a country’s exemption space. In determining limited space, the centrality of a country’s values of production is illustrated by tracking limited space from 1995 to 2012 for the EU, the US, India and China under assumptions of perfect management of maximum support. China’s rapidly rising values of production have generated limited space that now greatly exceeds that of the EU. The US limited space has been rising but India’s limited space is growing faster and approaches the US level. In recent years these four countries have used only a small part of their limited space. As values of production rise in individual countries and in the world, the relative importance of BTAMS as a component of limited space declines since it stays fixed in nominal terms. The amount and the share of non-exempt support that can be accommodated within the de minimis provisions are thus increasing for individual countries and in total for the world. Some countries with declining values of production in agriculture are the exceptions, e.g., Japan. The different entitlement of different countries to limitless exemption space, in combination with limited space growing faster in some countries than in others, means that the picture of countries’ policy space for domestic support to agricultural producers is rapidly changing from the picture when the Doha negotiations started.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Laws\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Laws\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2659406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2659406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

根据WTO《农业协定》的国内支持规则,提出了政策空间的概念。这种政策空间是二元的,包括豁免空间和限制空间两种。这两种在不同的国家有不同的规定。豁免空间源于对符合特定标准的政策的豁免权利,根据这些政策,支持将计入国家的限制,即豁免空间允许无限制的支持。标准为协议附件2第6.2条和第6.5条(绿色、发展和蓝色方框)中的标准。有限的空间源于在非豁免政策下提供不超过国家限额的支持的权利。对大多数国家来说,限额是根据每个产品的产值和整个农业的产值,利用该国的最低百分比计算出的最低水平。对于32个国家(15个发达国家和17个发展中国家),限额是支持的绑定总汇总测量(BTAMS),最低限额是超过该限额的支持计数的阈值。以管理价格收购的一些食品受特殊规则的约束,现在需要就豁免空间和限制空间的影响以及这两种空间之间的相互作用进行谈判。对协定的标准进行审查,以解释决定一国豁免空间的因素。在确定有限空间时,可以通过追踪1995年至2012年欧盟、美国、印度和中国的有限空间,在最大支持的完美管理假设下,来说明一个国家生产价值的中心地位。中国生产价值的迅速上升产生了有限的空间,目前已大大超过欧盟。美国有限的空间一直在增加,但印度有限的空间增长得更快,接近美国的水平。近年来,这四个国家只利用了其有限空间的一小部分。随着个别国家和世界的生产价值上升,BTAMS作为有限空间组成部分的相对重要性下降,因为它在名义上保持固定。因此,在最低限度规定范围内可以容纳的非豁免支助的数额和份额对个别国家和对全世界总的来说都在增加。一些农业产值下降的国家是例外,例如日本。不同国家享有无限豁免空间的权利不同,加上有限的豁免空间在一些国家比其他国家增长得更快,这意味着各国国内支持农业生产者的政策空间与多哈谈判开始时的情况正在迅速发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy Space in Agriculture Under the WTO Rules on Domestic Support
A concept of policy space is formulated under the domestic support rules of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. This policy space is dyadic, comprising two kinds of space: exemption space and limited space. The two kinds are available differently for different countries. Exemption space derives from the entitlement to exempt policies that meet given criteria from those policies under which support counts against the country’s limit(s), i.e., exemption space allows limitless support. The criteria are those of Annex 2, Article 6.2 and Article 6.5 of the Agreement (green, development and blue boxes). Limited space derives from the entitlement to provide support under non-exempt policies up to the country’s limit(s). For most countries the limits are the de minimis levels calculated from the value of production of each product and of agriculture as whole, using the country’s de minimis percentage. For 32 countries (15 developed and 17 developing) the limit is the Bound Total Aggregate Measurement of Support (BTAMS) and the de minimis levels are thresholds above which support counts against the limit. Some acquisition of foodstuffs at administered prices is subject to special rules, now subject to negotiations with implications for both exemption space and limited space and the interaction between these two kinds of space. The Agreement’s criteria are reviewed to interpret the factors determining a country’s exemption space. In determining limited space, the centrality of a country’s values of production is illustrated by tracking limited space from 1995 to 2012 for the EU, the US, India and China under assumptions of perfect management of maximum support. China’s rapidly rising values of production have generated limited space that now greatly exceeds that of the EU. The US limited space has been rising but India’s limited space is growing faster and approaches the US level. In recent years these four countries have used only a small part of their limited space. As values of production rise in individual countries and in the world, the relative importance of BTAMS as a component of limited space declines since it stays fixed in nominal terms. The amount and the share of non-exempt support that can be accommodated within the de minimis provisions are thus increasing for individual countries and in total for the world. Some countries with declining values of production in agriculture are the exceptions, e.g., Japan. The different entitlement of different countries to limitless exemption space, in combination with limited space growing faster in some countries than in others, means that the picture of countries’ policy space for domestic support to agricultural producers is rapidly changing from the picture when the Doha negotiations started.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信