(二)对大流行进行时间排序

Lydia Catedral
{"title":"(二)对大流行进行时间排序","authors":"Lydia Catedral","doi":"10.1075/lcs.22001.cat","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I apply the notions of chronotope and (re)chronotopization to\n the case of grassroots, migrant domestic worker (MDW) led activism during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. I compare the\n chronotopes that are produced by the Hong Kong government with those produced by migrant-led organizations to understand how\n migrants are marginalized and how they resist this marginalization. More specifically, I show how the spatiotemporal\n configurations of “home,” “days off,” and “the time of COVID-19 in Hong Kong” are rechronotopized – that is, reimagined,\n remoralized and rematerialized – through the discourses and actions of these grassroots organizations. I use this data and\n analysis to reflect on how the notion of rechronotopization can account for the social processes involved in activism more\n broadly; and to draw attention to the dialectic relationship between differently scaled chronotopic materialities and morally\n loaded chronotopic imaginaries.","PeriodicalId":252896,"journal":{"name":"Language, Culture and Society","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Re)chronotopizing the pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Lydia Catedral\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lcs.22001.cat\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I apply the notions of chronotope and (re)chronotopization to\\n the case of grassroots, migrant domestic worker (MDW) led activism during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. I compare the\\n chronotopes that are produced by the Hong Kong government with those produced by migrant-led organizations to understand how\\n migrants are marginalized and how they resist this marginalization. More specifically, I show how the spatiotemporal\\n configurations of “home,” “days off,” and “the time of COVID-19 in Hong Kong” are rechronotopized – that is, reimagined,\\n remoralized and rematerialized – through the discourses and actions of these grassroots organizations. I use this data and\\n analysis to reflect on how the notion of rechronotopization can account for the social processes involved in activism more\\n broadly; and to draw attention to the dialectic relationship between differently scaled chronotopic materialities and morally\\n loaded chronotopic imaginaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language, Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language, Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.22001.cat\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.22001.cat","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇文章中,我将时间点和(再)时间点化的概念应用于香港2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,由基层家庭佣工(MDW)领导的行动主义。我将香港政府制作的计时表与移民组织制作的计时表进行比较,以了解移民是如何被边缘化的,以及他们如何抵制这种边缘化。更具体地说,我通过这些草根组织的话语和行动,展示了“家”、“休息日”和“香港疫情时期”的时空配置如何被重新时间化,即重新想象、重新具体化和重新物质化。我利用这些数据和分析来反思,时间再topization的概念如何能够更广泛地解释行动主义所涉及的社会过程;并引起人们对不同尺度的时空物质性与承载道德的时空想象之间的辩证关系的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(Re)chronotopizing the pandemic
In this article I apply the notions of chronotope and (re)chronotopization to the case of grassroots, migrant domestic worker (MDW) led activism during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. I compare the chronotopes that are produced by the Hong Kong government with those produced by migrant-led organizations to understand how migrants are marginalized and how they resist this marginalization. More specifically, I show how the spatiotemporal configurations of “home,” “days off,” and “the time of COVID-19 in Hong Kong” are rechronotopized – that is, reimagined, remoralized and rematerialized – through the discourses and actions of these grassroots organizations. I use this data and analysis to reflect on how the notion of rechronotopization can account for the social processes involved in activism more broadly; and to draw attention to the dialectic relationship between differently scaled chronotopic materialities and morally loaded chronotopic imaginaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信