{"title":"超立方与立方连接环:一个拓扑评价","authors":"S. Kambhatla","doi":"10.1109/DMCC.1991.633358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypercubes and cube-connected cycles di'er in the number of links per node which has fundamental implications on several issues including performance and ease of implementation. In this paper, we evaluate these networks with respect to a number of parameters including several topological characterizations, fault-tolerance, various broadcast and point-to-point communication primitives. In the process we also derive several lower bound figures and describe algorithms for communication in cube-connected cycles. We conclude that while having lower number of links per node in a CCC might not degrade performance drastically (especially for lowe,r dimensions) as compared to a hypercube of a similar size, this feature has several consequences which substantially aid its (VLSI and non- VLSI) implementation.","PeriodicalId":313314,"journal":{"name":"The Sixth Distributed Memory Computing Conference, 1991. Proceedings","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypercube Vs Cube-Connected Cycles: A Topological Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"S. Kambhatla\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DMCC.1991.633358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hypercubes and cube-connected cycles di'er in the number of links per node which has fundamental implications on several issues including performance and ease of implementation. In this paper, we evaluate these networks with respect to a number of parameters including several topological characterizations, fault-tolerance, various broadcast and point-to-point communication primitives. In the process we also derive several lower bound figures and describe algorithms for communication in cube-connected cycles. We conclude that while having lower number of links per node in a CCC might not degrade performance drastically (especially for lowe,r dimensions) as compared to a hypercube of a similar size, this feature has several consequences which substantially aid its (VLSI and non- VLSI) implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Sixth Distributed Memory Computing Conference, 1991. Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Sixth Distributed Memory Computing Conference, 1991. Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DMCC.1991.633358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Sixth Distributed Memory Computing Conference, 1991. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DMCC.1991.633358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hypercube Vs Cube-Connected Cycles: A Topological Evaluation
Hypercubes and cube-connected cycles di'er in the number of links per node which has fundamental implications on several issues including performance and ease of implementation. In this paper, we evaluate these networks with respect to a number of parameters including several topological characterizations, fault-tolerance, various broadcast and point-to-point communication primitives. In the process we also derive several lower bound figures and describe algorithms for communication in cube-connected cycles. We conclude that while having lower number of links per node in a CCC might not degrade performance drastically (especially for lowe,r dimensions) as compared to a hypercube of a similar size, this feature has several consequences which substantially aid its (VLSI and non- VLSI) implementation.