关键词拍卖中的竞争对手破坏策略:谁是最受打击的?

M. Naldi, Antonio Pavignani, A. Grillo, Alessandro Lentini, G. Italiano
{"title":"关键词拍卖中的竞争对手破坏策略:谁是最受打击的?","authors":"M. Naldi, Antonio Pavignani, A. Grillo, Alessandro Lentini, G. Italiano","doi":"10.1109/CNSR.2011.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Search engines award their advertising space through keyword auctions. Some bidders may adopt an aggressive bidding strategy known as Competitor Busting, where they submit higher bids than what is strictly needed to win the auction so as to oust the other bidders. Despite the widespread concern for such practice, we show that the Competitor Busting strategy is largely ineffective. The lifetime of non-aggressive bidders, their presence in the auction, and the proportion of slots they are awarded are not affected by the presence of aggressive bidders. These conclusions are valid as long as the aggressive bidders do not have a significant budget advantage over non-aggressive ones.","PeriodicalId":272359,"journal":{"name":"2011 Ninth Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Competitor Busting Strategy in Keyword Auctions: Who's Worst Hit?\",\"authors\":\"M. Naldi, Antonio Pavignani, A. Grillo, Alessandro Lentini, G. Italiano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CNSR.2011.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Search engines award their advertising space through keyword auctions. Some bidders may adopt an aggressive bidding strategy known as Competitor Busting, where they submit higher bids than what is strictly needed to win the auction so as to oust the other bidders. Despite the widespread concern for such practice, we show that the Competitor Busting strategy is largely ineffective. The lifetime of non-aggressive bidders, their presence in the auction, and the proportion of slots they are awarded are not affected by the presence of aggressive bidders. These conclusions are valid as long as the aggressive bidders do not have a significant budget advantage over non-aggressive ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Ninth Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Ninth Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CNSR.2011.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Ninth Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CNSR.2011.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

搜索引擎通过关键词拍卖来奖励他们的广告空间。一些竞标者可能会采取一种激进的竞标策略,称为“竞争对手破坏”(Competitor Busting),他们提出的出价高于赢得拍卖的严格要求,以击败其他竞标者。尽管这种做法受到广泛关注,但我们表明,竞争对手破坏策略在很大程度上是无效的。非咄咄逼人的竞标者的寿命,他们在拍卖中的存在,以及他们获得的插槽比例不受咄咄逼人的竞标者的存在的影响。这些结论是有效的,只要积极的投标人没有明显的预算优势比非积极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Competitor Busting Strategy in Keyword Auctions: Who's Worst Hit?
Search engines award their advertising space through keyword auctions. Some bidders may adopt an aggressive bidding strategy known as Competitor Busting, where they submit higher bids than what is strictly needed to win the auction so as to oust the other bidders. Despite the widespread concern for such practice, we show that the Competitor Busting strategy is largely ineffective. The lifetime of non-aggressive bidders, their presence in the auction, and the proportion of slots they are awarded are not affected by the presence of aggressive bidders. These conclusions are valid as long as the aggressive bidders do not have a significant budget advantage over non-aggressive ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信