您的考虑:桥增强ACL恢复(BEAR):为什么,如何,何时

Sean McMillan, Scott Sigman, Chris Dougherty, Elizabeth Ford
{"title":"您的考虑:桥增强ACL恢复(BEAR):为什么,如何,何时","authors":"Sean McMillan, Scott Sigman, Chris Dougherty, Elizabeth Ford","doi":"10.60118/001c.38392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has been the gold standard for complete rupture for nearly 40 years. During this journey, variations on technique, rehab, and graft selection have been points of discussion. With the explosion of biologic augments currently seen in orthopedics, a paradigm shift of reconstruction to potential repair and/or restoration has begun. The bridge enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) procedure provides the ability to perform primary repair of the acutely torn ACL’s via utilization of a proprietary protein based scaffold. Many promising benefits have been shown from early clinical data, including potentially decreasing risk of osteoarthritis, decreased donor site morbidity, and higher success rates in the subset of patients that fail ACL restoration verses those that fail ACL reconstruction. Nevertheless, restoration has potential drawbacks and requires proper patient identification. As the implant has moved from research to commercialization, many questions still exist regarding why, how, and when to use the BEAR implant for injured patients. This manuscript aims to provide a broad overview of these questions and provide clarity based upon initial experiences.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"For Your Consideration: Bridge Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR): Why, How, and When\",\"authors\":\"Sean McMillan, Scott Sigman, Chris Dougherty, Elizabeth Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.38392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has been the gold standard for complete rupture for nearly 40 years. During this journey, variations on technique, rehab, and graft selection have been points of discussion. With the explosion of biologic augments currently seen in orthopedics, a paradigm shift of reconstruction to potential repair and/or restoration has begun. The bridge enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) procedure provides the ability to perform primary repair of the acutely torn ACL’s via utilization of a proprietary protein based scaffold. Many promising benefits have been shown from early clinical data, including potentially decreasing risk of osteoarthritis, decreased donor site morbidity, and higher success rates in the subset of patients that fail ACL restoration verses those that fail ACL reconstruction. Nevertheless, restoration has potential drawbacks and requires proper patient identification. As the implant has moved from research to commercialization, many questions still exist regarding why, how, and when to use the BEAR implant for injured patients. This manuscript aims to provide a broad overview of these questions and provide clarity based upon initial experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.38392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.38392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近40年来,前交叉韧带(ACL)重建一直是完全断裂的金标准。在这个过程中,技术、康复和移植物选择的变化一直是讨论的重点。随着目前在骨科中看到的生物增强物的爆炸式增长,从重建到潜在修复和/或修复的范式转变已经开始。桥式增强ACL修复(BEAR)程序通过利用专有的基于蛋白质的支架提供了对急性撕裂的ACL进行初级修复的能力。早期临床数据显示了许多有希望的益处,包括潜在地降低骨关节炎的风险,降低供体部位的发病率,以及与前交叉韧带重建失败的患者相比,前交叉韧带重建失败的患者的成功率更高。然而,修复有潜在的缺点,需要适当的患者识别。随着植入物从研究走向商业化,关于为什么、如何以及何时为受伤患者使用BEAR植入物,仍然存在许多问题。这份手稿的目的是提供这些问题的广泛概述,并提供基于初步经验的清晰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
For Your Consideration: Bridge Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR): Why, How, and When
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has been the gold standard for complete rupture for nearly 40 years. During this journey, variations on technique, rehab, and graft selection have been points of discussion. With the explosion of biologic augments currently seen in orthopedics, a paradigm shift of reconstruction to potential repair and/or restoration has begun. The bridge enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) procedure provides the ability to perform primary repair of the acutely torn ACL’s via utilization of a proprietary protein based scaffold. Many promising benefits have been shown from early clinical data, including potentially decreasing risk of osteoarthritis, decreased donor site morbidity, and higher success rates in the subset of patients that fail ACL restoration verses those that fail ACL reconstruction. Nevertheless, restoration has potential drawbacks and requires proper patient identification. As the implant has moved from research to commercialization, many questions still exist regarding why, how, and when to use the BEAR implant for injured patients. This manuscript aims to provide a broad overview of these questions and provide clarity based upon initial experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信