伊斯兰教的其他制裁(基础研究)

Yaser Esayed Fujo
{"title":"伊斯兰教的其他制裁(基础研究)","authors":"Yaser Esayed Fujo","doi":"10.37556/al-idah.041.01.0790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penalties in Islamic legislation are classified into two classes: the first one is Hudud penalties that estimated by the legislator almighty (mandatory rulings), and there is no rational judgment (Ijtihad) in it, but it accepts replacement with a narrow scope. The second is Ta'zir penalties (discretionary), and this section accepts replacement with great flexibility and wide discretion, such as imprisonment and financial fines. In the first topic, I talked about the concept of alternative sanctions and their lawfulness, while the second topic was on how to use some fundamentalist rules as guidelines for alternative sanctions, and I concluded the third topic with limited jurisprudential applications; to be a jurisprudential impact; as a foundational study for that kind of penalties.","PeriodicalId":159824,"journal":{"name":"Al-Idah","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Sanctions in Islam (Foundational Study)\",\"authors\":\"Yaser Esayed Fujo\",\"doi\":\"10.37556/al-idah.041.01.0790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Penalties in Islamic legislation are classified into two classes: the first one is Hudud penalties that estimated by the legislator almighty (mandatory rulings), and there is no rational judgment (Ijtihad) in it, but it accepts replacement with a narrow scope. The second is Ta'zir penalties (discretionary), and this section accepts replacement with great flexibility and wide discretion, such as imprisonment and financial fines. In the first topic, I talked about the concept of alternative sanctions and their lawfulness, while the second topic was on how to use some fundamentalist rules as guidelines for alternative sanctions, and I concluded the third topic with limited jurisprudential applications; to be a jurisprudential impact; as a foundational study for that kind of penalties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Idah\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Idah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.041.01.0790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Idah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.041.01.0790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊斯兰立法中的刑罚分为两类:第一类是由全能的立法者(强制性裁决)估计的Hudud刑罚,其中没有理性的判断(Ijtihad),但它接受以狭窄的范围代替。第二种是塔齐尔刑罚(酌处),这一节以极大的灵活性和广泛的酌处权接受替代,例如监禁和罚款。在第一个专题中,我谈到了替代制裁的概念及其合法性,而第二个专题是关于如何使用一些原教旨主义规则作为替代制裁的指导方针,我以有限的法理学应用结束了第三个专题;成为法理上的影响;作为这类处罚的基础研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative Sanctions in Islam (Foundational Study)
Penalties in Islamic legislation are classified into two classes: the first one is Hudud penalties that estimated by the legislator almighty (mandatory rulings), and there is no rational judgment (Ijtihad) in it, but it accepts replacement with a narrow scope. The second is Ta'zir penalties (discretionary), and this section accepts replacement with great flexibility and wide discretion, such as imprisonment and financial fines. In the first topic, I talked about the concept of alternative sanctions and their lawfulness, while the second topic was on how to use some fundamentalist rules as guidelines for alternative sanctions, and I concluded the third topic with limited jurisprudential applications; to be a jurisprudential impact; as a foundational study for that kind of penalties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信