J. M. Rodríguez, H. Merlino, Patricia Pesado, Ramón García-Martínez
{"title":"基于Reuters-21578数据库的公开信息提取方法评价","authors":"J. M. Rodríguez, H. Merlino, Patricia Pesado, Ramón García-Martínez","doi":"10.1145/3184066.3184099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following article shows the precision, the recall and the F1-measure for three knowledge extraction methods under Open Information Extraction paradigm. These methods are: ReVerb, OLLIE and ClausIE. For the calculation of these three measures, a representative sample of Reuters-21578 was used; 103 newswire texts were taken randomly from that database. A big discrepancy was observed, after analyzing the obtained results, between the expected and the observed precision for ClausIE. In order to save the observed gap in ClausIE precision, a simple improvement is proposed for the method. Although the correction improved the precision of Clausie, ReVerb turned out to be the most precise method; however ClausIE is the one with the better F1-measure.","PeriodicalId":109559,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of open information extraction methods using Reuters-21578 database\",\"authors\":\"J. M. Rodríguez, H. Merlino, Patricia Pesado, Ramón García-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3184066.3184099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following article shows the precision, the recall and the F1-measure for three knowledge extraction methods under Open Information Extraction paradigm. These methods are: ReVerb, OLLIE and ClausIE. For the calculation of these three measures, a representative sample of Reuters-21578 was used; 103 newswire texts were taken randomly from that database. A big discrepancy was observed, after analyzing the obtained results, between the expected and the observed precision for ClausIE. In order to save the observed gap in ClausIE precision, a simple improvement is proposed for the method. Although the correction improved the precision of Clausie, ReVerb turned out to be the most precise method; however ClausIE is the one with the better F1-measure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3184066.3184099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3184066.3184099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of open information extraction methods using Reuters-21578 database
The following article shows the precision, the recall and the F1-measure for three knowledge extraction methods under Open Information Extraction paradigm. These methods are: ReVerb, OLLIE and ClausIE. For the calculation of these three measures, a representative sample of Reuters-21578 was used; 103 newswire texts were taken randomly from that database. A big discrepancy was observed, after analyzing the obtained results, between the expected and the observed precision for ClausIE. In order to save the observed gap in ClausIE precision, a simple improvement is proposed for the method. Although the correction improved the precision of Clausie, ReVerb turned out to be the most precise method; however ClausIE is the one with the better F1-measure.