透明和可问责人工智能的公平本体:医院不良事件词汇案例研究

M. Basereh, A. Caputo, Rob Brennan
{"title":"透明和可问责人工智能的公平本体:医院不良事件词汇案例研究","authors":"M. Basereh, A. Caputo, Rob Brennan","doi":"10.1109/TransAI51903.2021.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the relation between the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) ontologies and accountability and transparency of ontology-based AI systems is analysed. Also, governance-related gaps in ontology quality evaluation metrics were identified by examining their relation with FAIR principles and FAcct (Fairness, Accountability, Transparency) governance aspects. A simple SKOS vocabulary, titled \"Hospital Adverse Incidents Classification Scheme\" (HAICS) has been used as a use case for this study. Theoretically, we found that there is a straight relation between FAIR principles and FAccT AI, which means that FAIR ontologies enhance transparency and accountability in ontology-based AI systems. We suggest that \"FAIRness\" should be assessed as one of the ontology quality evaluation aspects.","PeriodicalId":426766,"journal":{"name":"2021 Third International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FAIR Ontologies for Transparent and Accountable AI: A Hospital Adverse Incidents Vocabulary Case Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Basereh, A. Caputo, Rob Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TransAI51903.2021.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the relation between the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) ontologies and accountability and transparency of ontology-based AI systems is analysed. Also, governance-related gaps in ontology quality evaluation metrics were identified by examining their relation with FAIR principles and FAcct (Fairness, Accountability, Transparency) governance aspects. A simple SKOS vocabulary, titled \\\"Hospital Adverse Incidents Classification Scheme\\\" (HAICS) has been used as a use case for this study. Theoretically, we found that there is a straight relation between FAIR principles and FAccT AI, which means that FAIR ontologies enhance transparency and accountability in ontology-based AI systems. We suggest that \\\"FAIRness\\\" should be assessed as one of the ontology quality evaluation aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Third International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Third International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TransAI51903.2021.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Third International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TransAI51903.2021.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文分析了FAIR(可查找、可访问、可互操作、可重用)本体与基于本体的人工智能系统的问责性和透明性之间的关系。此外,通过检查本体质量评估指标与FAIR原则和fact(公平、问责、透明)治理方面的关系,确定了本体质量评估指标中与治理相关的差距。一个简单的SKOS词汇,标题为“医院不良事件分类方案”(HAICS),已被用作本研究的用例。从理论上讲,我们发现FAIR原则与FAccT AI之间存在直接关系,这意味着FAIR本体增强了基于本体的AI系统的透明度和问责制。我们建议将“公平性”作为本体质量评价的一个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FAIR Ontologies for Transparent and Accountable AI: A Hospital Adverse Incidents Vocabulary Case Study
In this paper, the relation between the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) ontologies and accountability and transparency of ontology-based AI systems is analysed. Also, governance-related gaps in ontology quality evaluation metrics were identified by examining their relation with FAIR principles and FAcct (Fairness, Accountability, Transparency) governance aspects. A simple SKOS vocabulary, titled "Hospital Adverse Incidents Classification Scheme" (HAICS) has been used as a use case for this study. Theoretically, we found that there is a straight relation between FAIR principles and FAccT AI, which means that FAIR ontologies enhance transparency and accountability in ontology-based AI systems. We suggest that "FAIRness" should be assessed as one of the ontology quality evaluation aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信