{"title":"Krytyka i propozycje rozszerzenia ontycznych podstaw odpowiedzialności Romana Ingardena","authors":"Karol Petryszak","doi":"10.15633/r.2447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to identify deficiencies of Roman Ingarden’s concept of responsibility. It points to a couple of illegitimate assumptions made by Ingarden. Moreover, in the place of rejected elements of his analyses, it proposes supplements coherent to Ingarden’s further line of thought. One of these proposed supplements is an attempt to introduce a category of “fundamental responsibility” which is ontically fundamental.","PeriodicalId":308936,"journal":{"name":"Racjonalia. Z punktu widzenia humanistyki","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Racjonalia. Z punktu widzenia humanistyki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/r.2447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Krytyka i propozycje rozszerzenia ontycznych podstaw odpowiedzialności Romana Ingardena
The goal of this paper is to identify deficiencies of Roman Ingarden’s concept of responsibility. It points to a couple of illegitimate assumptions made by Ingarden. Moreover, in the place of rejected elements of his analyses, it proposes supplements coherent to Ingarden’s further line of thought. One of these proposed supplements is an attempt to introduce a category of “fundamental responsibility” which is ontically fundamental.