企业负债

K. C. Priemel
{"title":"企业负债","authors":"K. C. Priemel","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190900571.013.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate on how to rein in transnational corporate power has greatly intensified over the past decades. Following a series of scandals, conflicts, and crises, civil rights activists, lawyers, and heterodox economists have been promoting efforts to hold private business accountable for the social, economic, ecological, and political costs of its actions. National legal cultures, however, differ widely on that issue, in particular with an eye to corporate personhood and extraterritoriality. After centuries of not prosecuting corporations on grounds of their lack of mens rea, the pattern changed in the twentieth century as developments in different legal spheres intertwined. When competition law coalesced with tightened national corruption standards as well as the emergence of international war crimes prosecution, a path toward international corporate liability opened up. By now a patchwork set of approaches has emerged in which soft and hard law, statutory and treaty law, and national and international regulation converge on corporate liability.","PeriodicalId":387123,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Institutions of International Economic Governance and Market Regulation","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Liabilities\",\"authors\":\"K. C. Priemel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190900571.013.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The debate on how to rein in transnational corporate power has greatly intensified over the past decades. Following a series of scandals, conflicts, and crises, civil rights activists, lawyers, and heterodox economists have been promoting efforts to hold private business accountable for the social, economic, ecological, and political costs of its actions. National legal cultures, however, differ widely on that issue, in particular with an eye to corporate personhood and extraterritoriality. After centuries of not prosecuting corporations on grounds of their lack of mens rea, the pattern changed in the twentieth century as developments in different legal spheres intertwined. When competition law coalesced with tightened national corruption standards as well as the emergence of international war crimes prosecution, a path toward international corporate liability opened up. By now a patchwork set of approaches has emerged in which soft and hard law, statutory and treaty law, and national and international regulation converge on corporate liability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Institutions of International Economic Governance and Market Regulation\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Institutions of International Economic Governance and Market Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190900571.013.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Institutions of International Economic Governance and Market Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190900571.013.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在过去的几十年里,关于如何控制跨国公司权力的辩论大大加剧了。在一系列丑闻、冲突和危机之后,民权活动家、律师和非正统经济学家一直在推动让私营企业对其行为的社会、经济、生态和政治成本负责的努力。但是,各国的法律文化在这个问题上差别很大,特别是在公司人格和治外法权方面。几个世纪以来,人们一直以公司缺乏犯罪动机为由不起诉公司,但随着不同法律领域的发展相互交织,这种模式在20世纪发生了变化。当竞争法与更严格的国家腐败标准以及国际战争罪起诉的出现相结合时,一条走向国际公司责任的道路就打开了。到目前为止,已经出现了一套拼凑的方法,其中软法和硬法,成文法和条约法,以及国家和国际法规都集中在公司责任上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate Liabilities
The debate on how to rein in transnational corporate power has greatly intensified over the past decades. Following a series of scandals, conflicts, and crises, civil rights activists, lawyers, and heterodox economists have been promoting efforts to hold private business accountable for the social, economic, ecological, and political costs of its actions. National legal cultures, however, differ widely on that issue, in particular with an eye to corporate personhood and extraterritoriality. After centuries of not prosecuting corporations on grounds of their lack of mens rea, the pattern changed in the twentieth century as developments in different legal spheres intertwined. When competition law coalesced with tightened national corruption standards as well as the emergence of international war crimes prosecution, a path toward international corporate liability opened up. By now a patchwork set of approaches has emerged in which soft and hard law, statutory and treaty law, and national and international regulation converge on corporate liability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信