{"title":"LTL指导规划:重新审视ETI中的自动工具组合","authors":"T. Margaria, B. Steffen","doi":"10.1109/SEW.2007.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit the automatic tool composition feature of the electronic tool integration platform under the perspective of planning. It turns out that in todays terminology, ETIs temporal logic-based synthesis of tool sequences is a form of planning-based automated orchestration. In contrast to Al-based planning approaches, our synthesis approach is not restricted to compute one solution, but it may compute all (shortest/minimal) solutions, with the intent to provide maximum insight into the potential design space.","PeriodicalId":277367,"journal":{"name":"31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2007)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LTL Guided Planning: Revisiting Automatic Tool Composition in ETI\",\"authors\":\"T. Margaria, B. Steffen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEW.2007.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We revisit the automatic tool composition feature of the electronic tool integration platform under the perspective of planning. It turns out that in todays terminology, ETIs temporal logic-based synthesis of tool sequences is a form of planning-based automated orchestration. In contrast to Al-based planning approaches, our synthesis approach is not restricted to compute one solution, but it may compute all (shortest/minimal) solutions, with the intent to provide maximum insight into the potential design space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2007)\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2007.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2007.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
LTL Guided Planning: Revisiting Automatic Tool Composition in ETI
We revisit the automatic tool composition feature of the electronic tool integration platform under the perspective of planning. It turns out that in todays terminology, ETIs temporal logic-based synthesis of tool sequences is a form of planning-based automated orchestration. In contrast to Al-based planning approaches, our synthesis approach is not restricted to compute one solution, but it may compute all (shortest/minimal) solutions, with the intent to provide maximum insight into the potential design space.