在他们学会发现真正的业务需求之前,mba将会步履蹒跚

Robin F. Goldsmith
{"title":"在他们学会发现真正的业务需求之前,mba将会步履蹒跚","authors":"Robin F. Goldsmith","doi":"10.1109/REET.2009.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper's primary purpose is to make educators aware of critical requirements concepts that customary courses and literature fail to address appropriately. Widely-accepted conventional requirements models continue to create creep - changes to settled requirements which are a major cause of project overruns. Business Analysts and others will continue to encounter such creep so long as they follow flawed models focusing on requirements of a product or system being created without adequately also discovering the REAL, business requirements the product must satisfy to provide value. Much of the difficulty comes from mistakenly trying to interpret these qualitatively different concepts in terms of familiar similar-sounding models, such as depicting them as merely different requirements levels. The two types of requirements are distinguished and the powerful Problem PyramidTM tool is described as a way to more reliably get both right quicker with less effort and aggravation. Educational implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":275444,"journal":{"name":"2009 Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BAs Will Falter Until They Learn to Discover REAL, Business Requirements\",\"authors\":\"Robin F. Goldsmith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REET.2009.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper's primary purpose is to make educators aware of critical requirements concepts that customary courses and literature fail to address appropriately. Widely-accepted conventional requirements models continue to create creep - changes to settled requirements which are a major cause of project overruns. Business Analysts and others will continue to encounter such creep so long as they follow flawed models focusing on requirements of a product or system being created without adequately also discovering the REAL, business requirements the product must satisfy to provide value. Much of the difficulty comes from mistakenly trying to interpret these qualitatively different concepts in terms of familiar similar-sounding models, such as depicting them as merely different requirements levels. The two types of requirements are distinguished and the powerful Problem PyramidTM tool is described as a way to more reliably get both right quicker with less effort and aggravation. Educational implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REET.2009.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REET.2009.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的主要目的是让教育工作者意识到传统课程和文献未能适当解决的关键需求概念。被广泛接受的传统需求模型继续产生蠕变——对已确定的需求的变更,这是导致项目超支的主要原因。业务分析师和其他人将继续遇到这样的蠕变,只要他们遵循有缺陷的模型,关注正在创建的产品或系统的需求,而没有充分发现产品必须满足的真正的业务需求才能提供价值。许多困难来自于错误地试图用熟悉的听起来相似的模型来解释这些性质不同的概念,例如将它们描述为仅仅不同的需求级别。这两种类型的需求是有区别的,功能强大的Problem PyramidTM工具被描述为一种更可靠地以更少的努力和更少的麻烦更快地得到正确答案的方法。讨论了教育意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BAs Will Falter Until They Learn to Discover REAL, Business Requirements
This paper's primary purpose is to make educators aware of critical requirements concepts that customary courses and literature fail to address appropriately. Widely-accepted conventional requirements models continue to create creep - changes to settled requirements which are a major cause of project overruns. Business Analysts and others will continue to encounter such creep so long as they follow flawed models focusing on requirements of a product or system being created without adequately also discovering the REAL, business requirements the product must satisfy to provide value. Much of the difficulty comes from mistakenly trying to interpret these qualitatively different concepts in terms of familiar similar-sounding models, such as depicting them as merely different requirements levels. The two types of requirements are distinguished and the powerful Problem PyramidTM tool is described as a way to more reliably get both right quicker with less effort and aggravation. Educational implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信