{"title":"宪法是什么意思?","authors":"A. Scalia","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1ddd0c5.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am one of a small number of judges, small number of anybody: judges, professors, lawyers; who are known as originalists. Our manner of interpreting the Constitution is to begin with the text, and to give that text the meaning that it bore when it was adopted by the people. I'm not a strict constructionist; I don't like the term \"strict construction. I do not think the Constitution, or any text, should be interpreted either strictly or sloppily; it should be interpreted reasonably. Many of my interpretations do not deserve the description \"strict”. I do believe, however, that you give the text the meaning it had when it was adopted.","PeriodicalId":344020,"journal":{"name":"On Equal Terms","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HOW DOES A CONSTITUTION MEAN?\",\"authors\":\"A. Scalia\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1ddd0c5.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am one of a small number of judges, small number of anybody: judges, professors, lawyers; who are known as originalists. Our manner of interpreting the Constitution is to begin with the text, and to give that text the meaning that it bore when it was adopted by the people. I'm not a strict constructionist; I don't like the term \\\"strict construction. I do not think the Constitution, or any text, should be interpreted either strictly or sloppily; it should be interpreted reasonably. Many of my interpretations do not deserve the description \\\"strict”. I do believe, however, that you give the text the meaning it had when it was adopted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"On Equal Terms\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"On Equal Terms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ddd0c5.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On Equal Terms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ddd0c5.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
I am one of a small number of judges, small number of anybody: judges, professors, lawyers; who are known as originalists. Our manner of interpreting the Constitution is to begin with the text, and to give that text the meaning that it bore when it was adopted by the people. I'm not a strict constructionist; I don't like the term "strict construction. I do not think the Constitution, or any text, should be interpreted either strictly or sloppily; it should be interpreted reasonably. Many of my interpretations do not deserve the description "strict”. I do believe, however, that you give the text the meaning it had when it was adopted.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
