{"title":"幕后:课程大纲说明","authors":"N. Buswell","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8659273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Full Research Paper, as part of a larger research project that sought to understand the experiences of assistant engineering professors at non-R1 institutions, I examined the teaching conceptions and methods that were described in participants’ course syllabi. The actual course syllabi documents were examined, and additionally, I examined the way the participants themselves described their course syllabi using an interviewing technique called document elicitation. In this paper, I present the findings for two participants who both taught a course on “Dynamic Systems and Controls.” This paper presents an exploratory content analysis of a course syllabus and the accompanying interviews about the course syllabus for two participants. I found that the instructors included a limited amount of information about their teaching conceptions and methods in their actual course syllabi documents. However, I found that the technique of document elicitation about course syllabi was extremely successful in getting a thick description about a participant’s teaching conceptions and methods. These findings point to the beneficial use of teaching syllabi in interviews and conversations about teaching as describing the backstory and decisions behind a course syllabus reveal much about instructors’ teaching conceptions and methods.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behind the Scenes: Course Syllabi explained\",\"authors\":\"N. Buswell\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2018.8659273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this Full Research Paper, as part of a larger research project that sought to understand the experiences of assistant engineering professors at non-R1 institutions, I examined the teaching conceptions and methods that were described in participants’ course syllabi. The actual course syllabi documents were examined, and additionally, I examined the way the participants themselves described their course syllabi using an interviewing technique called document elicitation. In this paper, I present the findings for two participants who both taught a course on “Dynamic Systems and Controls.” This paper presents an exploratory content analysis of a course syllabus and the accompanying interviews about the course syllabus for two participants. I found that the instructors included a limited amount of information about their teaching conceptions and methods in their actual course syllabi documents. However, I found that the technique of document elicitation about course syllabi was extremely successful in getting a thick description about a participant’s teaching conceptions and methods. These findings point to the beneficial use of teaching syllabi in interviews and conversations about teaching as describing the backstory and decisions behind a course syllabus reveal much about instructors’ teaching conceptions and methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this Full Research Paper, as part of a larger research project that sought to understand the experiences of assistant engineering professors at non-R1 institutions, I examined the teaching conceptions and methods that were described in participants’ course syllabi. The actual course syllabi documents were examined, and additionally, I examined the way the participants themselves described their course syllabi using an interviewing technique called document elicitation. In this paper, I present the findings for two participants who both taught a course on “Dynamic Systems and Controls.” This paper presents an exploratory content analysis of a course syllabus and the accompanying interviews about the course syllabus for two participants. I found that the instructors included a limited amount of information about their teaching conceptions and methods in their actual course syllabi documents. However, I found that the technique of document elicitation about course syllabi was extremely successful in getting a thick description about a participant’s teaching conceptions and methods. These findings point to the beneficial use of teaching syllabi in interviews and conversations about teaching as describing the backstory and decisions behind a course syllabus reveal much about instructors’ teaching conceptions and methods.