三种自粘流动复合材料对健全和脱矿牙釉质粘结强度的比较评价-体外研究

Shrikanth Benjwal, M. Goswami, Aditya saxena, Reenu Sarah Kurien, A. Mushtaq
{"title":"三种自粘流动复合材料对健全和脱矿牙釉质粘结强度的比较评价-体外研究","authors":"Shrikanth Benjwal, M. Goswami, Aditya saxena, Reenu Sarah Kurien, A. Mushtaq","doi":"10.25259/jgoh_60_2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe purpose of this study was to determine bond strength of three self-adhering flowable composites.\n\n\n\nMean tensile bond strength was measured in three groups – Group A – Constic, Group B – Dyad Flow, and Group C – Fusio Liquid Dentin on sound and demineralized primary teeth. Fracture pattern was studied using a stereomicroscope for each sample and in classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed fracture.\n\n\n\nMean tensile bond strength in sound enamel of Group A (Constic) was found to be 10.79 + 4.24, Group B (Dyad Flow) was 10.30 + 4.63, and of Group C (Fusio Liquid Dentine) was 11.87 + 4.45. No significant difference was found between the three groups (f = 0.327 and P = 0.724). However, a significant difference was found with demineralized enamel in three groups. Constic and Dyad Flow exhibited adhesive fracture pattern in majority of samples on sound enamel, whereas Fusio Liquid Dentin had mixed fracture pattern. On demineralized enamel, Constic exhibited adhesive fracture pattern majorly, whereas Dyad flow demonstrated mixed pattern and Fusio Liquid Dentin had more of cohesive fractures.\n\n\n\nConstic, Dyad Flow, and Fusio Liquid Dentin can be used instead of conventional pit and fissure sealants or in small occlusal cavities in primary teeth as a single step material.\n","PeriodicalId":441224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Oral Health","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three self-adhering flowable composites to sound and demineralized enamel – An in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Shrikanth Benjwal, M. Goswami, Aditya saxena, Reenu Sarah Kurien, A. Mushtaq\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/jgoh_60_2020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThe purpose of this study was to determine bond strength of three self-adhering flowable composites.\\n\\n\\n\\nMean tensile bond strength was measured in three groups – Group A – Constic, Group B – Dyad Flow, and Group C – Fusio Liquid Dentin on sound and demineralized primary teeth. Fracture pattern was studied using a stereomicroscope for each sample and in classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed fracture.\\n\\n\\n\\nMean tensile bond strength in sound enamel of Group A (Constic) was found to be 10.79 + 4.24, Group B (Dyad Flow) was 10.30 + 4.63, and of Group C (Fusio Liquid Dentine) was 11.87 + 4.45. No significant difference was found between the three groups (f = 0.327 and P = 0.724). However, a significant difference was found with demineralized enamel in three groups. Constic and Dyad Flow exhibited adhesive fracture pattern in majority of samples on sound enamel, whereas Fusio Liquid Dentin had mixed fracture pattern. On demineralized enamel, Constic exhibited adhesive fracture pattern majorly, whereas Dyad flow demonstrated mixed pattern and Fusio Liquid Dentin had more of cohesive fractures.\\n\\n\\n\\nConstic, Dyad Flow, and Fusio Liquid Dentin can be used instead of conventional pit and fissure sealants or in small occlusal cavities in primary teeth as a single step material.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":441224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/jgoh_60_2020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jgoh_60_2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定三种自粘流动复合材料的结合强度。测定三组(A组- Constic, B组- Dyad Flow, C组- fususio Liquid)牙本质对正常乳牙和脱矿乳牙的平均抗拉强度。在体视显微镜下对每个样品的断裂模式进行了研究,并将其分类为粘连性、内聚性或混合性断裂。A组(Constic)正常牙釉质平均抗拉强度为10.79 + 4.24,B组(Dyad Flow)平均抗拉强度为10.30 + 4.63,C组(fuso Liquid dentiine)平均抗拉强度为11.87 + 4.45。三组间差异无统计学意义(f = 0.327, P = 0.724)。然而,三组在脱矿牙釉质方面存在显著差异。在正常牙釉质上,Constic和Dyad Flow牙釉质多数呈粘连型断裂,而Fusio Liquid牙釉质多数呈混合型断裂。在脱矿牙釉质上,Constic牙釉质以粘连型为主,而Dyad flow牙釉质以混合型为主,Fusio Liquid牙釉质以粘连型为主。Constic, Dyad Flow和Fusio Liquid牙本质可以代替传统的坑状和裂隙密封剂,或者作为一种单步材料用于初级牙齿的小咬合腔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three self-adhering flowable composites to sound and demineralized enamel – An in vitro study
The purpose of this study was to determine bond strength of three self-adhering flowable composites. Mean tensile bond strength was measured in three groups – Group A – Constic, Group B – Dyad Flow, and Group C – Fusio Liquid Dentin on sound and demineralized primary teeth. Fracture pattern was studied using a stereomicroscope for each sample and in classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed fracture. Mean tensile bond strength in sound enamel of Group A (Constic) was found to be 10.79 + 4.24, Group B (Dyad Flow) was 10.30 + 4.63, and of Group C (Fusio Liquid Dentine) was 11.87 + 4.45. No significant difference was found between the three groups (f = 0.327 and P = 0.724). However, a significant difference was found with demineralized enamel in three groups. Constic and Dyad Flow exhibited adhesive fracture pattern in majority of samples on sound enamel, whereas Fusio Liquid Dentin had mixed fracture pattern. On demineralized enamel, Constic exhibited adhesive fracture pattern majorly, whereas Dyad flow demonstrated mixed pattern and Fusio Liquid Dentin had more of cohesive fractures. Constic, Dyad Flow, and Fusio Liquid Dentin can be used instead of conventional pit and fissure sealants or in small occlusal cavities in primary teeth as a single step material.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信