{"title":"垄断下大型、复杂技术产品的创新动态:以欧空局科学任务为例","authors":"Z. Szajnfarber, A. Weigel","doi":"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The roles of actors in a particular class of complex technological system - the ESA science mission - are mapped onto a competitive functional framework in order to identify key differences imposed by the market structure. Three general results are observed: there is no clear separation between \"buyers\" and \"sellers,\" the governing driver is an explicitly defined need-based \"pull\" and a high level of technological maturity is required before a new capability can be incorporated into the product development process. They are explained in terms of the incremental impacts of the complexity of the system, in a monopsony market structure with the government as monopsonist. A preliminary model is proposed and policy implications discussed.","PeriodicalId":423894,"journal":{"name":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation Dynamics of Large, Complex, Technological Products in a Monopsony: The Case of ESA Science Missions\",\"authors\":\"Z. Szajnfarber, A. Weigel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The roles of actors in a particular class of complex technological system - the ESA science mission - are mapped onto a competitive functional framework in order to identify key differences imposed by the market structure. Three general results are observed: there is no clear separation between \\\"buyers\\\" and \\\"sellers,\\\" the governing driver is an explicitly defined need-based \\\"pull\\\" and a high level of technological maturity is required before a new capability can be incorporated into the product development process. They are explained in terms of the incremental impacts of the complexity of the system, in a monopsony market structure with the government as monopsonist. A preliminary model is proposed and policy implications discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Innovation Dynamics of Large, Complex, Technological Products in a Monopsony: The Case of ESA Science Missions
The roles of actors in a particular class of complex technological system - the ESA science mission - are mapped onto a competitive functional framework in order to identify key differences imposed by the market structure. Three general results are observed: there is no clear separation between "buyers" and "sellers," the governing driver is an explicitly defined need-based "pull" and a high level of technological maturity is required before a new capability can be incorporated into the product development process. They are explained in terms of the incremental impacts of the complexity of the system, in a monopsony market structure with the government as monopsonist. A preliminary model is proposed and policy implications discussed.