{"title":"《最黑暗的时刻:私人信息控制与民主科学的终结","authors":"Roberto Caso","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3189519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of scientific research is based on data protected by secrecy and intellectual property (e.g., Elsevier Scopus or Clarivate Web of Sci- ence). The peer review process is essentially anonymous. While science has progressed thanks to public dialogue, the current evaluation system is centered on private control of information. This represents a fundamental shift from democratic to authoritarian science. Open Science may con- front this change only if it is accepted as the heir, in the digital age, of the values and principles that public and democratic science has traditionally fostered in the age of printing, thus becoming the guardian of a democrat- ic society.","PeriodicalId":114993,"journal":{"name":"Palgrave Critical University Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Darkest Hour: Private Information Control and the End of Democratic Science\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Caso\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3189519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation of scientific research is based on data protected by secrecy and intellectual property (e.g., Elsevier Scopus or Clarivate Web of Sci- ence). The peer review process is essentially anonymous. While science has progressed thanks to public dialogue, the current evaluation system is centered on private control of information. This represents a fundamental shift from democratic to authoritarian science. Open Science may con- front this change only if it is accepted as the heir, in the digital age, of the values and principles that public and democratic science has traditionally fostered in the age of printing, thus becoming the guardian of a democrat- ic society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palgrave Critical University Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palgrave Critical University Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3189519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palgrave Critical University Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3189519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
科学研究的评估基于受保密和知识产权保护的数据(例如,Elsevier Scopus或Clarivate Web of science)。同行评审过程基本上是匿名的。虽然科学的进步得益于公众的对话,但目前的评价体系以信息的私人控制为中心。这代表了从民主科学到威权科学的根本转变。开放科学只有在数字时代被接受为公共科学和民主科学传统上在印刷时代培养的价值观和原则的继承人,从而成为民主社会的守护者,才能面对这种变化。
The Darkest Hour: Private Information Control and the End of Democratic Science
The evaluation of scientific research is based on data protected by secrecy and intellectual property (e.g., Elsevier Scopus or Clarivate Web of Sci- ence). The peer review process is essentially anonymous. While science has progressed thanks to public dialogue, the current evaluation system is centered on private control of information. This represents a fundamental shift from democratic to authoritarian science. Open Science may con- front this change only if it is accepted as the heir, in the digital age, of the values and principles that public and democratic science has traditionally fostered in the age of printing, thus becoming the guardian of a democrat- ic society.