在基于论证的框架中生成新论证的逻辑工具

Geoffroy Aubry, V. Risch
{"title":"在基于论证的框架中生成新论证的逻辑工具","authors":"Geoffroy Aubry, V. Risch","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI.2005.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the framework proposed by Besnard and Hunter for argumentation, this paper aims to propose a logical tool for the generation of new arguments when two formal agents have to face their respective knowledge. The following notions are addressed: the behaviour of an agent facing an argument, the answer of an agent in front of a set of formulas, and relations among arguments. X-logics, a nonmonotonic extension of classical propositional logic proposed by Siegel and Forget, is used as the background formalism for representing the reasoning of the agents on arguments","PeriodicalId":294694,"journal":{"name":"17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'05)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a logical tool for generating new arguments in an argumentation based framework\",\"authors\":\"Geoffroy Aubry, V. Risch\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAI.2005.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the framework proposed by Besnard and Hunter for argumentation, this paper aims to propose a logical tool for the generation of new arguments when two formal agents have to face their respective knowledge. The following notions are addressed: the behaviour of an agent facing an argument, the answer of an agent in front of a set of formulas, and relations among arguments. X-logics, a nonmonotonic extension of classical propositional logic proposed by Siegel and Forget, is used as the background formalism for representing the reasoning of the agents on arguments\",\"PeriodicalId\":294694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'05)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2005.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2005.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文遵循贝斯纳德和亨特提出的论证框架,旨在提出一种逻辑工具,用于两个形式主体必须面对各自的知识时生成新的论证。讨论了以下概念:智能体面对一个参数的行为,智能体面对一组公式的回答,以及参数之间的关系。x逻辑(x -logic)是由Siegel和Forget提出的经典命题逻辑的非单调扩展,它被用作表示主体对论证推理的背景形式主义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a logical tool for generating new arguments in an argumentation based framework
Following the framework proposed by Besnard and Hunter for argumentation, this paper aims to propose a logical tool for the generation of new arguments when two formal agents have to face their respective knowledge. The following notions are addressed: the behaviour of an agent facing an argument, the answer of an agent in front of a set of formulas, and relations among arguments. X-logics, a nonmonotonic extension of classical propositional logic proposed by Siegel and Forget, is used as the background formalism for representing the reasoning of the agents on arguments
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信