{"title":"休谟论历史与社会生活中的理性","authors":"Christopher J. Berry","doi":"10.2307/2505246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After elaboration of the content and structure of Hume’s notion of human nature, his interpretation of superstition is examined. Hume’s ‘science of human nature’ permits him to label certain practices as depraved and to a discount the societal specificity of these practices. This means that Hume has, what is here called, a substantive theory of human nature with a formal theory of society which is the reverse of much modern (neo-Wittgensteinian) analysis.","PeriodicalId":256622,"journal":{"name":"Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hume on Rationality in History and Social Life\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J. Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2505246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After elaboration of the content and structure of Hume’s notion of human nature, his interpretation of superstition is examined. Hume’s ‘science of human nature’ permits him to label certain practices as depraved and to a discount the societal specificity of these practices. This means that Hume has, what is here called, a substantive theory of human nature with a formal theory of society which is the reverse of much modern (neo-Wittgensteinian) analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2505246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2505246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
After elaboration of the content and structure of Hume’s notion of human nature, his interpretation of superstition is examined. Hume’s ‘science of human nature’ permits him to label certain practices as depraved and to a discount the societal specificity of these practices. This means that Hume has, what is here called, a substantive theory of human nature with a formal theory of society which is the reverse of much modern (neo-Wittgensteinian) analysis.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
