人工智能与国际仲裁

Ankit Malhoutra, Faizan Ahmad
{"title":"人工智能与国际仲裁","authors":"Ankit Malhoutra, Faizan Ahmad","doi":"10.14210/nej.v27n2.p258-281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contextualization: During the early days of artificial intelligence research, computer scientists attempted to create algorithms that mimicked human intelligence by attempting to comprehend and recreate human cognitive processes has been predicted also to be used in a wide variety of tasks in international arbitration, including the appointment of arbitrators.\nObjectives: This paper examine if and how artificial intelligence may be used to assist or even replace arbitrators in their role of resolving disputes. Notably, this article is not about online arbitration, which refers to procedures in which processes are simplified via the use of technology, such as electronic filings, but where human arbitrators continue to make decisions.\nMethodology:The research uses the inductive method and a literature review.\nResult: International arbitration, which is always criticized for being overly costly and time-consuming, must take the assertion made by certain artificial intelligence developers that computers can accomplish the job of 360,000 attorneys seriously. Further study is required to determine the optimal technique to mix human decision-makers with artificial intelligence to get the most efficient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":249052,"journal":{"name":"Novos Estudos Jurí­dicos","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION\",\"authors\":\"Ankit Malhoutra, Faizan Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.14210/nej.v27n2.p258-281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contextualization: During the early days of artificial intelligence research, computer scientists attempted to create algorithms that mimicked human intelligence by attempting to comprehend and recreate human cognitive processes has been predicted also to be used in a wide variety of tasks in international arbitration, including the appointment of arbitrators.\\nObjectives: This paper examine if and how artificial intelligence may be used to assist or even replace arbitrators in their role of resolving disputes. Notably, this article is not about online arbitration, which refers to procedures in which processes are simplified via the use of technology, such as electronic filings, but where human arbitrators continue to make decisions.\\nMethodology:The research uses the inductive method and a literature review.\\nResult: International arbitration, which is always criticized for being overly costly and time-consuming, must take the assertion made by certain artificial intelligence developers that computers can accomplish the job of 360,000 attorneys seriously. Further study is required to determine the optimal technique to mix human decision-makers with artificial intelligence to get the most efficient outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Novos Estudos Jurí­dicos\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Novos Estudos Jurí­dicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v27n2.p258-281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novos Estudos Jurí­dicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v27n2.p258-281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

情境化:在人工智能研究的早期,计算机科学家试图通过试图理解和重建人类认知过程来创建模仿人类智能的算法,预计也将用于国际仲裁的各种任务,包括仲裁员的任命。目的:本文研究人工智能是否以及如何被用来协助甚至取代仲裁员解决纠纷的角色。值得注意的是,本文不是关于在线仲裁的,在线仲裁指的是通过使用技术(如电子归档)简化流程的程序,但由人工仲裁员继续做出决定。研究方法:采用归纳法和文献法。结果:国际仲裁一直被批评过于昂贵和耗时,必须认真对待某些人工智能开发人员的断言,即计算机可以完成36万名律师的工作。需要进一步研究确定将人类决策者与人工智能相结合的最佳技术,以获得最有效的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
Contextualization: During the early days of artificial intelligence research, computer scientists attempted to create algorithms that mimicked human intelligence by attempting to comprehend and recreate human cognitive processes has been predicted also to be used in a wide variety of tasks in international arbitration, including the appointment of arbitrators. Objectives: This paper examine if and how artificial intelligence may be used to assist or even replace arbitrators in their role of resolving disputes. Notably, this article is not about online arbitration, which refers to procedures in which processes are simplified via the use of technology, such as electronic filings, but where human arbitrators continue to make decisions. Methodology:The research uses the inductive method and a literature review. Result: International arbitration, which is always criticized for being overly costly and time-consuming, must take the assertion made by certain artificial intelligence developers that computers can accomplish the job of 360,000 attorneys seriously. Further study is required to determine the optimal technique to mix human decision-makers with artificial intelligence to get the most efficient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信