医疗保健互操作性——从制造标准部门吸取的经验教训

S. Ray
{"title":"医疗保健互操作性——从制造标准部门吸取的经验教训","authors":"S. Ray","doi":"10.1109/COASE.2009.5234092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high cost of healthcare in America is well-known, with imperfect interoperability adding as much as $77.8 billion/year to that cost, according to one study [1]. One of the principal causes of this high cost is the large amount of “paperworkz” — the administrative expenses incurred for each medical procedure. While the debate continues about whether the country would be better off with a single-payer medical system or the current private insurance approach, there are a number of ways to reduce the administrative costs without excessive risk. These costs are essentially about getting information in the right form, to the right place, at the right time — a challenge that is by no means unique to the healthcare industry. This presentation identifies some of the approaches that have been successful in the manufacturing sector to make the sharing of information — interoperability — more efficient. Manufacturing technology has been developing and improving for decades. Principles like lean manufacturing, paperless design, ISO 9000 performance practices and Taguchi methods are a given for today's major manufacturers. With trends toward global manufacturing and outsourcing, practices have now evolved to Internetbased communication of engineering designs, inventory levels, purchase orders, and a wide variety of other logistical, financial and technical data. Supporting all this, a suite of standards has been developed, deployed, and winnowed down to some that really help, leaving others that seemed promising but failed to meet expectations by the wayside.","PeriodicalId":386046,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare interoperability — lessons learned from the manufacturing standards sector\",\"authors\":\"S. Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COASE.2009.5234092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The high cost of healthcare in America is well-known, with imperfect interoperability adding as much as $77.8 billion/year to that cost, according to one study [1]. One of the principal causes of this high cost is the large amount of “paperworkz” — the administrative expenses incurred for each medical procedure. While the debate continues about whether the country would be better off with a single-payer medical system or the current private insurance approach, there are a number of ways to reduce the administrative costs without excessive risk. These costs are essentially about getting information in the right form, to the right place, at the right time — a challenge that is by no means unique to the healthcare industry. This presentation identifies some of the approaches that have been successful in the manufacturing sector to make the sharing of information — interoperability — more efficient. Manufacturing technology has been developing and improving for decades. Principles like lean manufacturing, paperless design, ISO 9000 performance practices and Taguchi methods are a given for today's major manufacturers. With trends toward global manufacturing and outsourcing, practices have now evolved to Internetbased communication of engineering designs, inventory levels, purchase orders, and a wide variety of other logistical, financial and technical data. Supporting all this, a suite of standards has been developed, deployed, and winnowed down to some that really help, leaving others that seemed promising but failed to meet expectations by the wayside.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2009.5234092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2009.5234092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

美国医疗保健的高成本是众所周知的,根据一项研究[1],不完善的互操作性每年增加了高达778亿美元的成本。造成这种高成本的主要原因之一是大量的“文书工作”,即每次医疗程序所产生的行政费用。虽然关于国家是采用单一付款人医疗系统还是目前的私人保险方法会更好的争论仍在继续,但有许多方法可以在不承担过多风险的情况下降低行政成本。这些成本主要是关于在正确的时间、以正确的形式将信息传送到正确的地方——这绝不是医疗保健行业独有的挑战。本报告确定了一些在制造业中已经成功的方法,使信息共享——互操作性——更有效。几十年来,制造技术一直在发展和改进。精益生产、无纸化设计、iso9000绩效实践和田口方法等原则是当今主要制造商的既定原则。随着全球制造和外包的趋势,实践现在已经发展到基于互联网的工程设计、库存水平、采购订单和其他各种物流、财务和技术数据的通信。为了支持这一切,已经开发、部署了一套标准,并筛选出一些真正有帮助的标准,而将其他看起来有希望但未能达到预期的标准抛在一边。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthcare interoperability — lessons learned from the manufacturing standards sector
The high cost of healthcare in America is well-known, with imperfect interoperability adding as much as $77.8 billion/year to that cost, according to one study [1]. One of the principal causes of this high cost is the large amount of “paperworkz” — the administrative expenses incurred for each medical procedure. While the debate continues about whether the country would be better off with a single-payer medical system or the current private insurance approach, there are a number of ways to reduce the administrative costs without excessive risk. These costs are essentially about getting information in the right form, to the right place, at the right time — a challenge that is by no means unique to the healthcare industry. This presentation identifies some of the approaches that have been successful in the manufacturing sector to make the sharing of information — interoperability — more efficient. Manufacturing technology has been developing and improving for decades. Principles like lean manufacturing, paperless design, ISO 9000 performance practices and Taguchi methods are a given for today's major manufacturers. With trends toward global manufacturing and outsourcing, practices have now evolved to Internetbased communication of engineering designs, inventory levels, purchase orders, and a wide variety of other logistical, financial and technical data. Supporting all this, a suite of standards has been developed, deployed, and winnowed down to some that really help, leaving others that seemed promising but failed to meet expectations by the wayside.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信