调整财政制度以吸引作业者实施EOR计划

F. Núñez, Christian Ramírez, J. L. Bashbush, O. Espinola
{"title":"调整财政制度以吸引作业者实施EOR计划","authors":"F. Núñez, Christian Ramírez, J. L. Bashbush, O. Espinola","doi":"10.2118/191241-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To optimize profit from Oil and Gas production activities, the Operating companies are often constrained in one side by contract terms with the host governments and on the other side by the nature of the reservoir, its fluids, and the resulting economics associated to its production and development. Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methodologies have shown to provide satisfactory results in increasing the recovery factor. Nonetheless, their applications are normally linked to important capital investments which might turn the economics of the project not favorable, unless enticements are offered to ease the way towards a win-win pre-arrangement.\n This paper aims to contrast results from economic evaluations and assessments for the implementation of an EOR methodology in a type field and how to foster cooperation with regulatory bodies to adapt their fiscal conditions to stimulate implementation of EOR techniques. In that way the host country could benefit from higher investment, larger production, increased tax revenue and a better recovery factors while the operating company would be enticed to assemble a quality team to design viable alternatives to maximize recoveries, increase reserves while increasing their profitability.\n The methodology proposed considers the calculation of economic and business indicators such as: Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Payout time, Company take and Government take which are obtained considering typical fiscal regimes applicable for Enhanced Oil Recovery techniques as a function of production profiles and EOR methodologies. The analyses are benchmarked versus natural depletion of current development, comparing investment alternatives and technical and economic benefits of possible Enhanced Oil Recovery alternatives and their prudent implementation.\n The implementation of EOR techniques for different fields are either incentivized or discouraged as a function of the different terms of typical fiscal regimes for hydrocarbon production. A proper analysis of the alternatives could be used as the basis of negotiations for the fiscal regime configuration to be applied. Provided the regulations are already intelligently designed and properly approved. Various production scenarios are analyzed to ascertain which EOR methodology may be more advantageous from the points of view of operating companies, national oil companies and government take.","PeriodicalId":352851,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018","volume":"44 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting Fiscal Regimes to Entice Operators to Implement EOR Schemes\",\"authors\":\"F. Núñez, Christian Ramírez, J. L. Bashbush, O. Espinola\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191241-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n To optimize profit from Oil and Gas production activities, the Operating companies are often constrained in one side by contract terms with the host governments and on the other side by the nature of the reservoir, its fluids, and the resulting economics associated to its production and development. Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methodologies have shown to provide satisfactory results in increasing the recovery factor. Nonetheless, their applications are normally linked to important capital investments which might turn the economics of the project not favorable, unless enticements are offered to ease the way towards a win-win pre-arrangement.\\n This paper aims to contrast results from economic evaluations and assessments for the implementation of an EOR methodology in a type field and how to foster cooperation with regulatory bodies to adapt their fiscal conditions to stimulate implementation of EOR techniques. In that way the host country could benefit from higher investment, larger production, increased tax revenue and a better recovery factors while the operating company would be enticed to assemble a quality team to design viable alternatives to maximize recoveries, increase reserves while increasing their profitability.\\n The methodology proposed considers the calculation of economic and business indicators such as: Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Payout time, Company take and Government take which are obtained considering typical fiscal regimes applicable for Enhanced Oil Recovery techniques as a function of production profiles and EOR methodologies. The analyses are benchmarked versus natural depletion of current development, comparing investment alternatives and technical and economic benefits of possible Enhanced Oil Recovery alternatives and their prudent implementation.\\n The implementation of EOR techniques for different fields are either incentivized or discouraged as a function of the different terms of typical fiscal regimes for hydrocarbon production. A proper analysis of the alternatives could be used as the basis of negotiations for the fiscal regime configuration to be applied. Provided the regulations are already intelligently designed and properly approved. Various production scenarios are analyzed to ascertain which EOR methodology may be more advantageous from the points of view of operating companies, national oil companies and government take.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018\",\"volume\":\"44 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191241-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191241-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了使油气生产活动的利润最大化,运营公司通常一方面受到与东道国政府的合同条款的限制,另一方面受到油藏性质、流体性质以及与生产和开发相关的经济效益的限制。提高采收率(EOR)方法在提高采收率方面取得了令人满意的结果。尽管如此,它们的应用通常与重要的资本投资有关,这可能会使项目的经济效益变得不利,除非提供优惠措施,以便实现双赢的预先安排。本文旨在对比某类型油田实施提高采收率方法的经济评估和评估结果,以及如何促进与监管机构的合作,以适应其财政条件,以刺激提高采收率技术的实施。通过这种方式,东道国可以从更高的投资、更大的产量、增加的税收和更好的采收率中受益,而运营公司将被吸引组建一支高质量的团队来设计可行的替代方案,以最大限度地提高采收率,增加储量,同时提高盈利能力。所提出的方法考虑了经济和商业指标的计算,如:净现值、内部收益率、支付时间、公司收益和政府收益,这些指标是考虑到适用于提高采收率技术的典型财政制度作为生产概况和EOR方法的函数而获得的。这些分析与当前开发的自然枯竭进行了基准对比,比较了各种投资选择、可能的提高采收率替代方案的技术和经济效益,以及它们的谨慎实施。根据油气生产的典型财政制度的不同条款,不同油田的EOR技术的实施可能受到鼓励,也可能受到阻碍。对备选方案的适当分析可以作为实施财政制度结构谈判的基础。前提是这些规定已经经过了明智的设计和适当的批准。分析了不同的生产方案,以确定从运营公司、国家石油公司和政府的角度来看,哪种提高采收率方法可能更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adapting Fiscal Regimes to Entice Operators to Implement EOR Schemes
To optimize profit from Oil and Gas production activities, the Operating companies are often constrained in one side by contract terms with the host governments and on the other side by the nature of the reservoir, its fluids, and the resulting economics associated to its production and development. Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methodologies have shown to provide satisfactory results in increasing the recovery factor. Nonetheless, their applications are normally linked to important capital investments which might turn the economics of the project not favorable, unless enticements are offered to ease the way towards a win-win pre-arrangement. This paper aims to contrast results from economic evaluations and assessments for the implementation of an EOR methodology in a type field and how to foster cooperation with regulatory bodies to adapt their fiscal conditions to stimulate implementation of EOR techniques. In that way the host country could benefit from higher investment, larger production, increased tax revenue and a better recovery factors while the operating company would be enticed to assemble a quality team to design viable alternatives to maximize recoveries, increase reserves while increasing their profitability. The methodology proposed considers the calculation of economic and business indicators such as: Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Payout time, Company take and Government take which are obtained considering typical fiscal regimes applicable for Enhanced Oil Recovery techniques as a function of production profiles and EOR methodologies. The analyses are benchmarked versus natural depletion of current development, comparing investment alternatives and technical and economic benefits of possible Enhanced Oil Recovery alternatives and their prudent implementation. The implementation of EOR techniques for different fields are either incentivized or discouraged as a function of the different terms of typical fiscal regimes for hydrocarbon production. A proper analysis of the alternatives could be used as the basis of negotiations for the fiscal regime configuration to be applied. Provided the regulations are already intelligently designed and properly approved. Various production scenarios are analyzed to ascertain which EOR methodology may be more advantageous from the points of view of operating companies, national oil companies and government take.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信