普莱西诉弗格森案与文学想象

Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature Pub Date : 1997-03-01 DOI:10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015799

B. Thomas

{"title":"普莱西诉弗格森案与文学想象","authors":"B. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I explore the relationship of the literary imagination to a specific Supreme Court case: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). I make no effort to draw conclusions about the general relation between law and literature from this specific example. I do hope that readers agree with me that the interconnections the example reveals are interesting in and of themselves. However, before going to literary connections we have to review the case itself.","PeriodicalId":312913,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plessy v. Ferguson and the Literary Imagination\",\"authors\":\"B. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay I explore the relationship of the literary imagination to a specific Supreme Court case: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). I make no effort to draw conclusions about the general relation between law and literature from this specific example. I do hope that readers agree with me that the interconnections the example reveals are interesting in and of themselves. However, before going to literary connections we have to review the case itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

在这篇文章中，我探讨了文学想象与最高法院的一个具体案件的关系:普莱西诉弗格森案(1896)。我不想从这个具体的例子中得出关于法律与文学的一般关系的结论。我希望读者能同意我的观点，即这个例子所揭示的相互联系本身就很有趣。然而，在讨论文学联系之前，我们必须回顾一下这个案例本身。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Plessy v. Ferguson and the Literary Imagination

In this essay I explore the relationship of the literary imagination to a specific Supreme Court case: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). I make no effort to draw conclusions about the general relation between law and literature from this specific example. I do hope that readers agree with me that the interconnections the example reveals are interesting in and of themselves. However, before going to literary connections we have to review the case itself.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature

自引率

0.00%

发文量