甲酸和有机泥浆酸对日本南长冈气田火山岩的增产作用

Keisuke Yamamura, N. Yoshida, Keisuke Shimoda, Shunjiro Shimada, R. Matsui, M. Ziauddin
{"title":"甲酸和有机泥浆酸对日本南长冈气田火山岩的增产作用","authors":"Keisuke Yamamura, N. Yoshida, Keisuke Shimoda, Shunjiro Shimada, R. Matsui, M. Ziauddin","doi":"10.2118/209224-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Unlike acid stimulation in sandstone and carbonate formations, acid stimulation of volcanic formations is not well documented in the literature, and its effectiveness and applicability are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate acidizing of volcanic rocks (especially rhyolite) as a well stimulation technique through a comprehensive experimental and modeling investigation using formation samples from a volcanic reservoir, the Minami-Nagaoka gas field in Japan.\n The experimental study consists of rock characterization, solubility tests, coreflooding tests, and batch reactor tests. The rock samples are investigated with computed tomography (CT) for textural characteristics and with X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis for lithological characteristics. With these results, candidate acid systems are selected, and their effectiveness in terms of the capability of dissolving volcanic rocks is evaluated through acid solubility tests. Acid coreflooding tests are performed using undamaged plug cores to evaluate permeability responses caused by acid/rock reactions under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions (300°F and 3,000 psi, respectively). Batch reactor tests are conducted to quantify damage due to secondary/tertiary reactions.\n The mineralogical and textural characteristics of the rock samples let us select formic acid as the preflush acid and a mixture of formic acid and hydrofluoric acid (HF) called organic mud acid (OMA) as the main treatment acid. The composition of OMA was a mixture of 9% formic acid and 1% HF or 10% formic acid and 0.5% HF in this work. Results of the coreflooding tests with the preflush acid indicated permeability enhancement in all the samples and, especially in cores with cemented fractures filled by carbonate minerals, substantial permeability enhancement was observed. On the other hand, cores treated with OMA after the preflush indicated further permeability enhancement in some cases without cemented fractures, whereas other cases showed permeability impairment after the OMA injection. Furthermore, results of the batch reactor tests with formic acid indicated low precipitation risks, whereas those with OMA suggested higher precipitation risks. Detailed analysis on the thin sections and residuals of the batch reactor tests with OMA highlighted the precipitation of unique fluorides, and the precipitation risk was modeled and quantitatively evaluated with geochemical simulations. Although there is more room to investigate the risks of the usage of OMA for the volcanic rocks, the results in this work suggest the use of formic acid as a main treatment acid, as in carbonate acidizing, for wells with abundant cemented fractures in near-wellbore regions.\n This paper provides insights on acid stimulation in volcanic rocks (especially rhyolite). The results provide a fundamental understanding on the acid/rock reactions and the potential benefits/risks for productivity enhancement of wells in the subject volcanic reservoir.","PeriodicalId":153181,"journal":{"name":"SPE Production & Operations","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Formic Acid and Organic Mud Acid for Stimulation of Volcanic Rocks in Minami-Nagaoka Gas Field, Japan\",\"authors\":\"Keisuke Yamamura, N. Yoshida, Keisuke Shimoda, Shunjiro Shimada, R. Matsui, M. Ziauddin\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/209224-pa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Unlike acid stimulation in sandstone and carbonate formations, acid stimulation of volcanic formations is not well documented in the literature, and its effectiveness and applicability are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate acidizing of volcanic rocks (especially rhyolite) as a well stimulation technique through a comprehensive experimental and modeling investigation using formation samples from a volcanic reservoir, the Minami-Nagaoka gas field in Japan.\\n The experimental study consists of rock characterization, solubility tests, coreflooding tests, and batch reactor tests. The rock samples are investigated with computed tomography (CT) for textural characteristics and with X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis for lithological characteristics. With these results, candidate acid systems are selected, and their effectiveness in terms of the capability of dissolving volcanic rocks is evaluated through acid solubility tests. Acid coreflooding tests are performed using undamaged plug cores to evaluate permeability responses caused by acid/rock reactions under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions (300°F and 3,000 psi, respectively). Batch reactor tests are conducted to quantify damage due to secondary/tertiary reactions.\\n The mineralogical and textural characteristics of the rock samples let us select formic acid as the preflush acid and a mixture of formic acid and hydrofluoric acid (HF) called organic mud acid (OMA) as the main treatment acid. The composition of OMA was a mixture of 9% formic acid and 1% HF or 10% formic acid and 0.5% HF in this work. Results of the coreflooding tests with the preflush acid indicated permeability enhancement in all the samples and, especially in cores with cemented fractures filled by carbonate minerals, substantial permeability enhancement was observed. On the other hand, cores treated with OMA after the preflush indicated further permeability enhancement in some cases without cemented fractures, whereas other cases showed permeability impairment after the OMA injection. Furthermore, results of the batch reactor tests with formic acid indicated low precipitation risks, whereas those with OMA suggested higher precipitation risks. Detailed analysis on the thin sections and residuals of the batch reactor tests with OMA highlighted the precipitation of unique fluorides, and the precipitation risk was modeled and quantitatively evaluated with geochemical simulations. Although there is more room to investigate the risks of the usage of OMA for the volcanic rocks, the results in this work suggest the use of formic acid as a main treatment acid, as in carbonate acidizing, for wells with abundant cemented fractures in near-wellbore regions.\\n This paper provides insights on acid stimulation in volcanic rocks (especially rhyolite). The results provide a fundamental understanding on the acid/rock reactions and the potential benefits/risks for productivity enhancement of wells in the subject volcanic reservoir.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE Production & Operations\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE Production & Operations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/209224-pa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Production & Operations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209224-pa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与砂岩和碳酸盐岩地层的酸改造不同,火山地层的酸改造在文献中没有很好的记录,其有效性和适用性也没有得到很好的了解。本研究旨在通过对日本南长冈气田火山岩储层地层样品的综合实验和建模研究,对火山岩(尤其是流纹岩)酸化作为一种增产技术进行评价。实验研究包括岩石表征、溶解度测试、岩心注水测试和间歇反应器测试。用计算机断层扫描(CT)研究岩石样品的结构特征,用x射线衍射(XRD)分析岩石样品的岩性特征。根据这些结果,选择候选酸体系,并通过酸溶解度测试评价其溶解火山岩能力的有效性。在高温和高压条件下(分别为300°F和3,000 psi),使用未损坏的桥塞岩心进行酸驱测试,以评估酸/岩石反应引起的渗透率响应。间歇式反应器试验是为了量化二级/三级反应造成的损害。根据岩石样品的矿物学和结构特征,我们选择甲酸作为前冲洗酸,并选择甲酸和氢氟酸(HF)的混合物有机泥浆酸(OMA)作为主要处理酸。OMA的组成为9%甲酸和1% HF或10%甲酸和0.5% HF的混合物。预冲酸岩心驱替试验结果表明,所有样品的渗透率都有所提高,特别是在碳酸盐矿物充填胶结裂缝的岩心中,渗透率明显提高。另一方面,在未发生骨水泥骨折的情况下,在预冲洗后进行OMA处理的岩心渗透率进一步提高,而在注入OMA后,其他病例的渗透率出现了损害。此外,使用甲酸的间歇反应器试验结果表明沉淀风险低,而使用OMA的间歇反应器则表明沉淀风险较高。利用OMA对间歇反应器试验的薄片和残余物进行了详细分析,强调了独特氟化物的沉淀,并利用地球化学模拟对沉淀风险进行了建模和定量评估。尽管在火山岩中使用OMA的风险还有更多的研究空间,但这项工作的结果表明,对于近井区有大量固井裂缝的井,可以使用甲酸作为主要的处理酸,就像在碳酸盐岩酸化中一样。本文对火山岩(特别是流纹岩)的酸刺激作用有了新的认识。研究结果为该火山岩储层的酸/岩反应以及提高油井产能的潜在效益/风险提供了基本的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Formic Acid and Organic Mud Acid for Stimulation of Volcanic Rocks in Minami-Nagaoka Gas Field, Japan
Unlike acid stimulation in sandstone and carbonate formations, acid stimulation of volcanic formations is not well documented in the literature, and its effectiveness and applicability are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate acidizing of volcanic rocks (especially rhyolite) as a well stimulation technique through a comprehensive experimental and modeling investigation using formation samples from a volcanic reservoir, the Minami-Nagaoka gas field in Japan. The experimental study consists of rock characterization, solubility tests, coreflooding tests, and batch reactor tests. The rock samples are investigated with computed tomography (CT) for textural characteristics and with X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis for lithological characteristics. With these results, candidate acid systems are selected, and their effectiveness in terms of the capability of dissolving volcanic rocks is evaluated through acid solubility tests. Acid coreflooding tests are performed using undamaged plug cores to evaluate permeability responses caused by acid/rock reactions under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions (300°F and 3,000 psi, respectively). Batch reactor tests are conducted to quantify damage due to secondary/tertiary reactions. The mineralogical and textural characteristics of the rock samples let us select formic acid as the preflush acid and a mixture of formic acid and hydrofluoric acid (HF) called organic mud acid (OMA) as the main treatment acid. The composition of OMA was a mixture of 9% formic acid and 1% HF or 10% formic acid and 0.5% HF in this work. Results of the coreflooding tests with the preflush acid indicated permeability enhancement in all the samples and, especially in cores with cemented fractures filled by carbonate minerals, substantial permeability enhancement was observed. On the other hand, cores treated with OMA after the preflush indicated further permeability enhancement in some cases without cemented fractures, whereas other cases showed permeability impairment after the OMA injection. Furthermore, results of the batch reactor tests with formic acid indicated low precipitation risks, whereas those with OMA suggested higher precipitation risks. Detailed analysis on the thin sections and residuals of the batch reactor tests with OMA highlighted the precipitation of unique fluorides, and the precipitation risk was modeled and quantitatively evaluated with geochemical simulations. Although there is more room to investigate the risks of the usage of OMA for the volcanic rocks, the results in this work suggest the use of formic acid as a main treatment acid, as in carbonate acidizing, for wells with abundant cemented fractures in near-wellbore regions. This paper provides insights on acid stimulation in volcanic rocks (especially rhyolite). The results provide a fundamental understanding on the acid/rock reactions and the potential benefits/risks for productivity enhancement of wells in the subject volcanic reservoir.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信