现代员工敬业度与符号互动主义社会学理论的协调

G. Simon, Iris Zhou
{"title":"现代员工敬业度与符号互动主义社会学理论的协调","authors":"G. Simon, Iris Zhou","doi":"10.11634/216796061706894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employee Engagement (EE) spans over 30 years discourse within the practitioner and scientific domain, and have become a strategic imperative within organizations. However, due to the tumultuous history of inconsistencies in conceptualization, poor validation, and various discrepancies among scholars and practitioners, the construct has attracted interest across disciplines and industry. Accordingly, the claims of its positive impact on bottom line and other organizational outcome have become the catalyst for further research. Owing to that, this paper highlights past and present findings on EE. Drawing on previous studies, we highlight the cons of the construct and propose a multi-foci approach that extends the positive psychology perspective. We reference the earlier works of Kahn, and the influence sociology played in the conceptualization of Kahn’s theory of the employee’s preferred self. We conclude and recommend the Interactionist view as a theoretical framework within the field of industrial sociology to support our arguments. Keywords : Employee engagement, positive psychology, sociology, rational choice theory, social interactionism.","PeriodicalId":206506,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business and Management","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harmonizing Modern Day Employee Engagement with the Sociological Theory of Symbolic Interactionism\",\"authors\":\"G. Simon, Iris Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.11634/216796061706894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Employee Engagement (EE) spans over 30 years discourse within the practitioner and scientific domain, and have become a strategic imperative within organizations. However, due to the tumultuous history of inconsistencies in conceptualization, poor validation, and various discrepancies among scholars and practitioners, the construct has attracted interest across disciplines and industry. Accordingly, the claims of its positive impact on bottom line and other organizational outcome have become the catalyst for further research. Owing to that, this paper highlights past and present findings on EE. Drawing on previous studies, we highlight the cons of the construct and propose a multi-foci approach that extends the positive psychology perspective. We reference the earlier works of Kahn, and the influence sociology played in the conceptualization of Kahn’s theory of the employee’s preferred self. We conclude and recommend the Interactionist view as a theoretical framework within the field of industrial sociology to support our arguments. Keywords : Employee engagement, positive psychology, sociology, rational choice theory, social interactionism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061706894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061706894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

员工敬业度(EE)在实践者和科学领域的讨论跨越了30多年,并已成为组织内的战略要求。然而,由于概念化的不一致,验证性差以及学者和实践者之间的各种差异的动荡历史,该结构引起了跨学科和行业的兴趣。因此,其对底线和其他组织结果的积极影响的主张已成为进一步研究的催化剂。因此,本文重点介绍了过去和现在关于情感表达的研究结果。在以往研究的基础上,我们强调了这种结构的缺点,并提出了一种扩展积极心理学视角的多焦点方法。我们参考了Kahn的早期作品,以及社会学对Kahn的员工偏好自我理论概念化的影响。我们总结并推荐互动主义观点作为工业社会学领域的理论框架来支持我们的论点。关键词:员工敬业度,积极心理学,社会学,理性选择理论,社会互动论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harmonizing Modern Day Employee Engagement with the Sociological Theory of Symbolic Interactionism
Employee Engagement (EE) spans over 30 years discourse within the practitioner and scientific domain, and have become a strategic imperative within organizations. However, due to the tumultuous history of inconsistencies in conceptualization, poor validation, and various discrepancies among scholars and practitioners, the construct has attracted interest across disciplines and industry. Accordingly, the claims of its positive impact on bottom line and other organizational outcome have become the catalyst for further research. Owing to that, this paper highlights past and present findings on EE. Drawing on previous studies, we highlight the cons of the construct and propose a multi-foci approach that extends the positive psychology perspective. We reference the earlier works of Kahn, and the influence sociology played in the conceptualization of Kahn’s theory of the employee’s preferred self. We conclude and recommend the Interactionist view as a theoretical framework within the field of industrial sociology to support our arguments. Keywords : Employee engagement, positive psychology, sociology, rational choice theory, social interactionism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信