一期骨水泥珠改善股骨内膜恢复:改良型和初始锥形滑动股骨假体的比较研究

J. Shelton, M. Khaliq, Jonathan A. Barrow, Sophie McGran, A. Hamer
{"title":"一期骨水泥珠改善股骨内膜恢复:改良型和初始锥形滑动股骨假体的比较研究","authors":"J. Shelton, M. Khaliq, Jonathan A. Barrow, Sophie McGran, A. Hamer","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debate continues about the merits of nonarticulating cement beads versus articulating cement spacers. This unit believes beads promote femoral endosteal bone regeneration producing an environment conducive to cementing at second stage. This article assesses the femoral cement mantle of matched primary and revision cemented taper slip stems (CTSSs). We performed a retrospective cohort study of all second stage CTSSs then selected a randomized group from primary joints from the arthroplasty database. The two revision hip fellows assessed the initial postop radiograph for femoral cement quality using the Barrack grading system. Results were analyzed using SPSS for interobserver reliability and quality of cementing. A total of 105 patients were identified as having received a CTSS at second stage and 105 primaries randomly selected. The average age was 81 years in the revision group and 79 years in the primary group. The revision group contained 54% female patients and the primary group contained 56%. In the primary group 73% on anteroposterior (AP) were grade A and 65% on lateral. In the revision group 77% on AP were grade A and 76% on the lateral. The interclass correlation coefficient showed good correlation between assessors. Only the lateral cementing demonstrated a significant difference between groups in favor of the revision group. This article suggests that the use of beads at first stage followed by a cemented femoral prosthesis at second stage will have equal to, or slightly better cementing than those receiving a primary hip replacement. We believe that cement can have additional benefits in second stage revisions such as further delivery of antibiotics into the effective joint space. As revision surgeons we aim to foster as many options as possible for the subsequent reconstruction. The major limitation of this study is the low number of articulating spacers used in this institution.","PeriodicalId":427844,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Hip Surgery","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cement Beads at First Stage Improve Femoral Endosteal Recovery: A Comparative Study of Revision and Primary Taper Slip Femoral Components\",\"authors\":\"J. Shelton, M. Khaliq, Jonathan A. Barrow, Sophie McGran, A. Hamer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1757327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Debate continues about the merits of nonarticulating cement beads versus articulating cement spacers. This unit believes beads promote femoral endosteal bone regeneration producing an environment conducive to cementing at second stage. This article assesses the femoral cement mantle of matched primary and revision cemented taper slip stems (CTSSs). We performed a retrospective cohort study of all second stage CTSSs then selected a randomized group from primary joints from the arthroplasty database. The two revision hip fellows assessed the initial postop radiograph for femoral cement quality using the Barrack grading system. Results were analyzed using SPSS for interobserver reliability and quality of cementing. A total of 105 patients were identified as having received a CTSS at second stage and 105 primaries randomly selected. The average age was 81 years in the revision group and 79 years in the primary group. The revision group contained 54% female patients and the primary group contained 56%. In the primary group 73% on anteroposterior (AP) were grade A and 65% on lateral. In the revision group 77% on AP were grade A and 76% on the lateral. The interclass correlation coefficient showed good correlation between assessors. Only the lateral cementing demonstrated a significant difference between groups in favor of the revision group. This article suggests that the use of beads at first stage followed by a cemented femoral prosthesis at second stage will have equal to, or slightly better cementing than those receiving a primary hip replacement. We believe that cement can have additional benefits in second stage revisions such as further delivery of antibiotics into the effective joint space. As revision surgeons we aim to foster as many options as possible for the subsequent reconstruction. The major limitation of this study is the low number of articulating spacers used in this institution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Hip Surgery\",\"volume\":\"246 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Hip Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Hip Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于非铰接水泥珠与铰接水泥隔离剂孰优孰优的争论仍在继续。该单位认为,珠促进股骨内骨再生,在第二阶段产生有利于骨水泥的环境。本文评估了匹配的初级和改良型锥形滑动柄(CTSSs)的股骨骨水泥套。我们对所有二期CTSSs进行了回顾性队列研究,然后从关节成形术数据库中的主要关节中随机选择一组。两位髋关节翻修研究员使用Barrack分级系统评估股骨骨水泥质量的初始停止后x线片。结果用SPSS分析观察者间的可靠性和固井质量。共有105名患者被确定为在第二阶段接受了CTSS, 105名原发性患者被随机选择。改良组的平均年龄为81岁,初始组的平均年龄为79岁。改良组女性患者占54%,原发组占56%。在初级组中,73%的正位(AP)为A级,65%的侧位(AP)为A级。复习组77% AP为A级,76%外侧为A级。类间相关系数显示评价者之间有较好的相关性。只有侧位骨水泥在两组间表现出显著的差异,这有利于翻修组。这篇文章表明,在第一阶段使用珠状假体,然后在第二阶段使用骨水泥股骨假体,其骨水泥效果与接受首次髋关节置换术的患者相同,或者稍好。我们认为,在第二阶段的修复中,水泥可以带来额外的好处,例如进一步将抗生素输送到有效关节空间。作为整形外科医生,我们的目标是为后续重建提供尽可能多的选择。本研究的主要限制是该机构使用的关节间隔器数量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cement Beads at First Stage Improve Femoral Endosteal Recovery: A Comparative Study of Revision and Primary Taper Slip Femoral Components
Debate continues about the merits of nonarticulating cement beads versus articulating cement spacers. This unit believes beads promote femoral endosteal bone regeneration producing an environment conducive to cementing at second stage. This article assesses the femoral cement mantle of matched primary and revision cemented taper slip stems (CTSSs). We performed a retrospective cohort study of all second stage CTSSs then selected a randomized group from primary joints from the arthroplasty database. The two revision hip fellows assessed the initial postop radiograph for femoral cement quality using the Barrack grading system. Results were analyzed using SPSS for interobserver reliability and quality of cementing. A total of 105 patients were identified as having received a CTSS at second stage and 105 primaries randomly selected. The average age was 81 years in the revision group and 79 years in the primary group. The revision group contained 54% female patients and the primary group contained 56%. In the primary group 73% on anteroposterior (AP) were grade A and 65% on lateral. In the revision group 77% on AP were grade A and 76% on the lateral. The interclass correlation coefficient showed good correlation between assessors. Only the lateral cementing demonstrated a significant difference between groups in favor of the revision group. This article suggests that the use of beads at first stage followed by a cemented femoral prosthesis at second stage will have equal to, or slightly better cementing than those receiving a primary hip replacement. We believe that cement can have additional benefits in second stage revisions such as further delivery of antibiotics into the effective joint space. As revision surgeons we aim to foster as many options as possible for the subsequent reconstruction. The major limitation of this study is the low number of articulating spacers used in this institution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信