带着意义回话:加纳语英语语篇中回应语用分析

C. F. Lomotey
{"title":"带着意义回话:加纳语英语语篇中回应语用分析","authors":"C. F. Lomotey","doi":"10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i10/hs2110-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In interaction, interlocutors are expected to allow the talk to flow without difficulty. This smooth flow can be achieved with the use of little words (or response tokens) which do not appear to have any effect on the syntactic structure of the utterances but add important pragmatic value to them. This paper is a case study on the use of response tokens in Ghanaian English. It investigates the types and functions of the tokens as they used in this variety of English. To achieve this, conversations were recorded from 50 students and analyzed qualitatively. Using Xudong’s combined Lumping and Splitting approaches, the types and functions of the tokens were identified. The results revealed that there are minimal tokens (single words and non-lexical vocalizations) and non-minimal tokens (phrases, clauses, premodified tokens, clusters, extended responses, collaborative finishes). The tokens were utilized as continuers, convergence and divergence markers, and as engagement markers. Based on the results, it is argued that response tokens should be seen as meaningful elements which should be employed to maintain fluency in talk-in-interaction. in","PeriodicalId":443596,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talking Back with Meaning: A Pragmatic Analysis of Response Tokens in Ghanaian English Discourse\",\"authors\":\"C. F. Lomotey\",\"doi\":\"10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i10/hs2110-004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In interaction, interlocutors are expected to allow the talk to flow without difficulty. This smooth flow can be achieved with the use of little words (or response tokens) which do not appear to have any effect on the syntactic structure of the utterances but add important pragmatic value to them. This paper is a case study on the use of response tokens in Ghanaian English. It investigates the types and functions of the tokens as they used in this variety of English. To achieve this, conversations were recorded from 50 students and analyzed qualitatively. Using Xudong’s combined Lumping and Splitting approaches, the types and functions of the tokens were identified. The results revealed that there are minimal tokens (single words and non-lexical vocalizations) and non-minimal tokens (phrases, clauses, premodified tokens, clusters, extended responses, collaborative finishes). The tokens were utilized as continuers, convergence and divergence markers, and as engagement markers. Based on the results, it is argued that response tokens should be seen as meaningful elements which should be employed to maintain fluency in talk-in-interaction. in\",\"PeriodicalId\":443596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i10/hs2110-004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i10/hs2110-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在互动中,对话者应该让谈话顺利进行。这种流畅可以通过使用小词(或反应符号)来实现,这些词对话语的句法结构没有任何影响,但却增加了重要的语用价值。这篇论文是关于加纳英语中应答符号使用的案例研究。它调查的类型和功能的标志,因为他们在各种英语中使用。为了实现这一目标,我们记录了50名学生的对话,并对其进行了定性分析。利用徐东的集总和分割相结合的方法,确定了标记的类型和功能。结果表明,存在最小标记(单个单词和非词汇发声)和非最小标记(短语、分句、预修饰标记、集群、扩展响应、协作完成)。这些标记被用作连续标记、收敛和发散标记以及参与标记。在此基础上,本文认为响应符号应该被视为有意义的元素,应该被用来保持对话中的流畅性。在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Talking Back with Meaning: A Pragmatic Analysis of Response Tokens in Ghanaian English Discourse
: In interaction, interlocutors are expected to allow the talk to flow without difficulty. This smooth flow can be achieved with the use of little words (or response tokens) which do not appear to have any effect on the syntactic structure of the utterances but add important pragmatic value to them. This paper is a case study on the use of response tokens in Ghanaian English. It investigates the types and functions of the tokens as they used in this variety of English. To achieve this, conversations were recorded from 50 students and analyzed qualitatively. Using Xudong’s combined Lumping and Splitting approaches, the types and functions of the tokens were identified. The results revealed that there are minimal tokens (single words and non-lexical vocalizations) and non-minimal tokens (phrases, clauses, premodified tokens, clusters, extended responses, collaborative finishes). The tokens were utilized as continuers, convergence and divergence markers, and as engagement markers. Based on the results, it is argued that response tokens should be seen as meaningful elements which should be employed to maintain fluency in talk-in-interaction. in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信